Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no registration, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Too much phosphorous in electroless nickel




1996

I have some problems with the amount of phosphorus in an electroless nickel coating on aluminum parts. Our spec requires that the phosphorus be a "high phosphorus" coating of 10 to 13 percent. One of our suppliers uses a bath that states the phosphorus content is 10.5 to 13 percent. The problem is that checks of the plated parts show that the phosphorus content of the nickel coating on the parts can be as low as 9.2 percent phosphorus.

Question: What is the accepted/spec'd definition of a "high phosphorus" electroless nickel coating? 10 to 13... 9 to 14...?

Question: Do aluminum parts plate out differently than steel parts? i.e., does the phosphorus content vary more on aluminum parts as opposed to steel parts?

Jason Ingram



"Electroless Plating"
by Mallory & Hajdu

on AbeBooks

or eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

"Chemical (Electroless) Nickel Plating"
by G. G. Gawrilov

on AbeBooks

or eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

1996

Jason,
I have done a fair amount of electroless plating, but am not a technical expert. It is my belief, from several sources, that P is controlled by the bath make up and operational use. IE: the exact pH, temperature, and nickel/hypo concentrations affect the amount of P. Also, as many baths age (tank turnovers) they change the P content and the internal stress. In day to day operation of an average job shop, the P content will be on the low end of advertised. 9.2%P does not surprise me, but I am a pessimist.

Definition of a "high P" EN is totally with your customer. Conventional is 10 -13% but that is subject to great amount of disagreement. Running High P EN baths are a pain trying to maintain 11.0-11.5%P in comparison to the numerous 4-7% baths that are sold. Anyone that says otherwise is extraordinarily sharp, or lucky or unaware of what he is producing. After the first molecule layer of nickel, it should not make any difference what the substrate is because it is plating on EN.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"