netneut
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing


Finishing.com has been free for 22 years,
but without net neutrality we could soon
cease to exist. Do us a solid, click on
the banner, and contact congress today!
HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
topic 0012

Electrical Resistance Testing of MIL-C-5541 Chromate

adv.    Chemionic 4-wire resistance test


A discussion started in 1995 & continuing through 2017

(1995)

Q. I am looking for information on chemical conversion coatings on aluminum and aluminum alloys. The issue that is in question is the Mil-C-5541 [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil] E Military specification requirement to verify class 3 chemical conversion coatings by running an electrical resistance test per QPL-81706 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet]. This procedure involves applying an electrode pressure of 200 psi to the coating and measuring for less than 5000 micro ohms per square inch. Our company wants to find a test method that can verify compliance of our stock of parts without elaborate (costly) test setups. If you can help, it would be greatly appreciated.  




Reforming Mil Specs

(1999)

A. I would recommend the approach of at least one major aerospace supplier:

In their process specification, they call out the same mil-specs that you do, except that they exclude clear coatings, this makes the identification of a chromated part very easy. If you must use a clear coating, at least specify a blue, slightly iridescent color to make identification easier. The QPL-81706 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] is a qualified product list and I would mention it in the specification, and pick one brand to write your specification around, allowing for alternates.

I have never seen anyone use the resistance measurement for chromate conversion coatings. I have seen a simple apparatus using a light bulb and some low voltage source for testing for the presence of an anodic coating on aluminum, since the clear coatings are hard to distinguish visually. But an anodic coating is much harder than a conversion coating and the test is easy to do with a simple method.

I think you should specify the appearance and color for all parts; and corrosion resistance (ASTM B117 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] ), and coating weight (Mil-C-5541 [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil]) on a monthly basis for a sample of parts or a test panel, depending on how critical the corrosion resistance is for the parts.

tom pullizzi monitor
Tom Pullizzi
Falls Township,
   Pennsylvania 



(2001)

Q. What is the difference between MIL spec MIL-C-5541 and MIL-C-5541E?

Ken Daly
- Greenville, South Carolina


(2001)

A. Just the revision level, Ken. Rev. D was released in 1989. Rev. E came sometime after that, probably the mid 1990's. These days people should see Mil-DTL-5541 [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil]

Ted Mooney, finishing.com Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView This Week's HOT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.