|
|
This is one of a series. We welcome editorial content and non-commercial news from our readers, and will create a page like this each time we receive input. Feel free to offer a new news or editorial item, or to append your own comments to an existing editorial. |
|
When there are fire hazards, we expect knowledgeable experts to tell us about it. We expect food experts to tell us about sanitary practices in the food industry, doctors to keep us posted on medical matters, automotive engineers to keep us abreast of vehicle matters, and environmentalists to warn us about risks to the water we drink and the air we breathe.
Now, it's fine to have government agencies to tune the policies and then enforce them. But to expect pro-activism from bureaucrats is a bit unrealistic; it is nearly always outside experts, not government agencies, who focus attention on matters. We have an EPA because of Rachel Carson, not vice versa.
Most things are just fine in the finishing industry, but a few things are wrong. If it is not to be you and I who will focus the necessary attention to right them, then who?
|
All of us are aware of the relentless pressure to, for example, keep reducing the thickness of gold when it's already too thin. Who is supposed to say something if not us?! This, while not an heirloom quality watch, is not a $9.95 special either, it's a $75-$100 model. Note that the gold is completely worn off the four raised 'knobs'-- from occasional wear in less than a year. Is this what we want the public to think of our art and science? What are you and I, 'the experts', going to do about it? |
|