Electroless Nickel Thickness Vs. Salt Fog Resistance
.
We are looking to plate steel parts with
Mil-C-26074 [link is to spec at TechStreet] electroless nickel. Since the parts are steel, it is recommended that the Grade Coating be applied (0.0015-inch thick). We can only go up to 0.0008 inch, max. due to insertion requirements for the finished product. The question is: What kind of salt fog (
ASTM B117 [link is to "Download ASTM Standards" from ANSI.org]
) resistance can we expect to get from coating a steel part with 0.0008-inch of electroless nickel? Can we achieve 48-hours? 200-hours? What about for 0.0005-inch (Grade B)?
Are there graphs available plotting electroless nickel plating thickness versus salt fog resistance (hours)? Thanks for your help.
Marc PepiUS Army Research Lab - APG, Maryland, USA
.
There are a lot of factors that effect the corrosion resistance,but the factors that have the greatest effect are surface roughness and%P of the EN. The lower the surface roughness the better the corrosion resistance. Also the higher the %P the better the corrosion resistance.
You should be able to get 48 hrs of salt spray from a high P EN deposit.
George Shahin
- Rock Hill, South Carolina
.
George is right, roughness, P content have a great effect on SS resistance but on top of that, heating which is done to improve hardness has also a great effect. For instance, 25 microns of high PEN should result in about 1000 hours in SS but if you heat it , the resistance will be reduced to about 100 hours.
|
|
|
