|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Terry Hickling |
Hi,
Either Terry or I have misread the question. Are asking about the
toxicity of the bath? Terry has dealt with this. But, I thought that
you were asking about the toxicity of the coating produced from
it!
Which is it?
Harry Parkes
Harry Parkes
- Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Hi Harry,
I think it must be the tank mixture - otherwise why list all the
volatiles? If you are correct then the cured film is possibly OK -
but again use your supplier he knows the answer.
Harry Parkes - that's a name I recognise from the past as one of the
larger co in the Black Country?
Terry
Terry Hickling
Martex
Paints Ltd
Birmingham, UK
Thanks for all the comments on the toxicity question I raised. It
was a question of toxicity of the final coating that is used on a
jewellery item, the constituents are as listed. As suggested I looked
at the msds for each and as is correctly stated, in their native form
them are toxic. In the solid form of a surface layer though ... the
manufacturer should know, or the supplier of the chemistry he used.
The mf is far eastern, questions are being asked by the importer I am
working with to them.
Many thanks for your input.
Dave
Dave Jarvis
- Sheffield, UK
Hi,
Firstly to Terry. Yes I am that Harry Parkes. Dave has answered the
question of bath or coating.
Dave, ideally one would obtain sufficient coating to be able to
submit for formal toxicity testing. When I was involved with ED
coatings we decided that it would be do extremely
difficult/impossible to do. The coating would have to be
electrodeposited and fully cured to be a representative specimen. As
the coating is thin, hard and strongly adherent, separating coating
from the substrate was not practical. We did consider applying the
coating, scraping it off before curing and then curing it separately.
But as I have said could you truly call it
representative? Would you like to convince a judge of that?
So, we decided that we would make a practical assessment along these
lines.
1) A virtue of ED coatings that the process separates the resin from
the other tank constituents so that the concentration of solvents in
the coating is much lower than in the bath. Any residual sovents
would evaporate from the thin and even coating during curing.
2) Properly cured, the coating would be fully crosslinked and very
resistant the chemical attack except by materials which would
themselves be toxic.
3) The coating were of resin types which were widely used in
industry.
4) Despite the above reasoning, as a matter of caution because we had
no actual data, we would not recommend their use for holding drinks
or food blending. I don't recall the issue ever being raised by
users.
Harry Parkes
- Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2009 finishing.com