|
Letter 5065
De waxing of parts post
electroplating.
.
My company are about to replace trichloroethylene vapour
degreasing with an aqueous base process. The "Trike" is also used for
final dewaxing of parts post electroplating. We have not found a
satisfactory replacement process for dewaxing as yet. I would welcome
comments on possible environmentally sound alternatives in use.
Mark Dunphy
- Dublin, Ireland
.
Actually, perchloroethylene is slightly better for wax removal as
it has a higher temperature aiding in thermally removing wax
(quicker). Perc is about as bad as trike, but since its vapor point
is higher, it is easier for the coils to knock it down. You can
reduce your solvent use considerably by putting a higher freeboard on
the tank. eliminate crossdrafts as much as possible.
Normally, simple walls can be cheaply installed and removed for
maintenance as required and will cut use enough to pay for the
addition in a month or so in many facilities. Use a slower hoist
speed, both in and out. Allow for a longer drip time in the cold
zone. Freeboard chiller coils are a mixed bag. some help but bad for
the solution in areas of high humidity that will cause condensation
of water into the tank. The excess wax can be removed from the top of
the tank on a routine basis by shutting the tank down overnight and
using a homemade holey long handled hoe.
For all of the claims made, nothing has replaced the efficient and
ecconomical use of a well designed and well operated vapor degreaser.
James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
.
Mike,
Have you made any progress in your search? Carol Eden (United
Airlines) in San Francisco published an article in Plating and
Surface Finishing magazine.
Katherine Dougan
- Annapolis, Maryland
.
Dear Mark-
We at United Airlines Maintenance base have totally removed all
degreasers from our shop. We no longer use them for cleaning or
dewaxing on engines and aircraft. For cleaning, all our products are
aqueous based. For dewaxing after plating, we use hot water (180-190
degrees F) to melt off the wax, which we recover, and then go into
Bioact 280 (an aqueous cleaner/solvent), then rinse and into a
cleaner and rinse again. This process has been in use for two years
and we have the bugs worked out. Either Carol Eden the author of the
article the previous writer mentioned or I (the process engineer)
could give you more details if you need them.
Jeanne Kitazaki
United Airlines - San Francisco, CA
Dear Reader, please --
- Post a
question on a different subject.
-
- Answer or follow-up on this subject (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
 |