|
|
![]() Cycles thru suppliers. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Hakan Esen, Material Engineer(BSc.) |
There seems a loose correlation between microcracking and Sn
concentration in the melt. But these cracks have mostly been known to
occur only where there was an unusual stress in the steel that was
revealed by galvanizing, not caused by it.
Sn levels of less than 0.2% appear to have much lower risk, and 0.1%
even better.
A new EU guideline seems imminent which will recommend lower Sn, and
Bi, but allow marginally higher Pb.
|
Geoff Crowley |
Sirs:
From 1972 to early 2003, I had no questions about cracking of steel
due to galvanizing. During 2003 I had many questions about cracking.
The cracking first showed itself as wires used to hang the steel
began breaking. The galvanizing workers refused to work because upon
withdrawal from the molten zinc the wires would break and splash the
molten zinc on the workers. At first "bad wires" were suspected. Then
tin in the zinc was identified as a possible cause. Then stressed
steel products were showing cracks. These included overhead highway
sign structures, steel tube pilings that cracked along welds, square
steel tubes that peeled like a banana, scaffolding, cracks along
welds, a stadium roof structure in England, rectangular frames,
etc.
In September of 2003, I received a 19 page scientific study of these
cracks on a stressed steel bridge structure.
One of the conclusions of this study was: "The presence of tin at
locations where the cracks had been propagating just prior to removal
from the galvanizing bath proves conclusively that tin was the
embrittling agent."
The steel cracking appears to start at about 0.3% tin and is
extensive above 0.4% tin.
On Oct. 1 and Oct. 3, 2003, I sent two letters to ASTM recommending
that the tin level in hot dip galvanizing be severly limited. As of
today, I believe that ASTM has taken no action on this matter.
Regards,
|
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant |

Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2009 finishing.com