| |
45073
Decorative chrome vs. Cr6->Cr3
transition [Indiana]
May 9, 2007
Mr. Mooney;
I saw your response to another reader in regards to chromium vs.
chromate. My question is somewhat related and is as follows....
The European Union has issued a directive adhered to by automakers,
which eliminated the use of Cr6 in zinc/chromate surface treatments.
This did not, however, affect the products which utilze a
nickel/chrome surface treatment (i.e. decorative chrome). Why were
the decorative chrome parts not affected by this?
Thank you.
J. Abnet
John C. Abnet
QC Coordinator/QE, automotive fasteners - Berne, Indiana, USA
May 10, 2007
Hello, John. Admittedly this issue is very confusing for people
who are not personally involved in metal finishing because two very
different metal finishing processes use chromium chemicals, and
either trivalent chromium or hexavalent may be used in either, and
which one was used is important to the end user in one case but not
in the other :-)
Let's talk chromium electroplating first. One step in the process
is to immerse the part into the chromium plating tank, apply
electricity, and electrochemically deposit the bright metal that we
see on truck bumpers. Once the part leaves the tank and is throughly
rinsed, the only chromium it has on it is metallic chrome. Metallic
chrome doesn't have valence, and it makes no difference to the end
user whether the manufacturer created that metal deposit by dipping
the part into a tank that had trivalent chromium chemicals in it or
hexavalent chemicals.
While there are advantages to trivalent chromium electroplating
baths (like lower fuming, and reduced operator exposure and water
treatment costs) and advantages to hexavalent chromium baths (like
lower cost, thicker deposits possible, more consistent color), they
don't affect the safety of the product or the end user.
In the case of chromate conversion coatings on zinc, however, the
deposit is not chromium metal-- it is a rather complex mixture of
"salts" of chromium. At the risk of slight simplification, if the
tank it was dipped in had hexavalent chomium salts in it, the deposit
on the part is a hexavalent chromium salt, whereas if the tank it was
dipped in contained only trivalent chromium salts then it has only
trivalent salts on it. And these hexavalent chromate salts that
remain on the part are considered hazardous.
|
|

Ted Mooney, P.E.
finishing.com
Brick, NJ
|


 |
|