| |
45000
Calibration of Titrations?
[California]
May 2, 2007
Hi,
My name is Robin Smith and I am a ceramic engineer, working at
plating the end terminals of ceramic capacitors. We plate nickel and
tin onto the capacitors. Our medical customer (ie parts go into
pacemakers, hearing aids, implantable devices) is asking for more
calibration and control. Specifically, they are asking for a
calibration for plating titrations of our nickel and tin titrations.
How is a titration calibrated?
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Robin Smith
Capacitor Manufacturer - Valencia, CA
First of eight simultaneous responses -- May 3, 2007
Yeah... that isn't the easiest to answer directly is it?
What I have done here when the question has arisen is to make sure
that my supplier (presumably a lab) can show me some traceable or
verifiable certificates for my lab chemicas (presumably they have to
certify the concentration - that is all I mean).
Then, make a known sample using lab grade chemicals and titrate it a
few times to discover how accurate your readings are and to make sure
that they are centered on the correct level.
You may have to use more than one operator doing the titrations and
do some statistical analysis of the results (look up R&R studies
- Repeatability and Reproduceability Studies and the gauge controls
that were, in the past, required by QS9000) before your customer is
satisfied with your answer, but that is the basic method.
Good luck!
Second of eight simultaneous responses -- May 3, 2007
Hi Robin,
I have heard (but not seen) auto titration dispensing units for
various titrants. This does not include determining end point colors,
turbidity, etc. You may want to talk to the customer to let them know
you don't have this type of equipment. They probably have a QA person
that may not understand laboratory apparatus, and methods of
titrations. Some equipment in the lab can be calibrated, and some
can't. If a flask or graduated cylinder says 100 mls, we trust that
is what it is.
If they insist on documentation of titration calculations and bath
additions, maybe that would satisfy them. Some customers demand that
the standards be supplied by a laboratory supply house, instead of
your lab tech or chemist making them up. That can get expensive as
you know. Good luck with the customer.
Mark Baker
Process Engineer - Syracuse, NY, USA
Third of eight simultaneous responses -- May 3, 2007
There is an ISO specification that many companies are gradually
going to. I think that the number is 15020.
Normally, if you are using burettes, you will uses a calibrated
balance to weigh a specified percentage of burette dispensed
distilled water. A 50 ml burette might have 5 - 10 samples taken.
Pipettes are full quantity and in this case, you would pay for class
A glassware. DI water is also weighed.
Another kicker is you normally have to do a 2 point calibration of
the balance before and after use.
James Watts
- FL
Fourth of eight simultaneous responses -- May 3, 2007
One common method is the known addition, whereby you make a
standard addition of the component being measured to the sample after
the titration is performed and then further titrate to the new
endpoint. For example, when looking to measure % HCl, you would
titrate the sample to the endpoint, make a known addition of HCl,
then titrate further to the new endpoint. You can then calculate the
% recovery of the known addition as a QC indicator of the
titration.
Another method is to titrate a known standard concentration of the
analyte in question. You can then adjust the calculations of the
titration to account for variations in the titrant solution.
|
James Totter,
CEF
- Tallahassee, FL
|
Fifth of eight simultaneous responses -- May 4, 2007
I've been in your situation before and have a few ideas that may
be useful. First, have you tried convincing your customer that this
process doesn't require calibration? If your glassware is like mine
it has a qualification marked on it; mine has TD 20C, meaning it's
set To Deliver the marked volume at a temperature of 20C. As long as
your pipettes and burettes are not chipped or broken they are
designed to maintain their volumes and don't need to be calibrated.
The titration method is based on a chemical reaction that hasn't
changed in recorded chemical history. Therefore there isn't anything
that can fall out of calibration, so the process doesn't require
calibration.
Not all customers will be swayed by the above argument. If the
customer is adamant about getting calibration data for the titration
process then you can go about verifying the calibration of your
glassware. At room temperature one milliliter of distilled water
weighs 1.00 grams. Fill your burette or pipette with distilled water
and discharge a measured amount onto a tared container on a scale
(assuming, of course, that the scale has been calibrated). Record the
weight. Do this at least 10 times for every piece of glassware. You
now have enough data to calculate a standard deviation or percent
error or whatever you need to make your customer happy.
If that isn't good enough then you can prepare some plating solutions
at known nickel or tin concentrations and titrate those. Once again
you should repeat the test at least 10 times and develop whatever
statistical data your customer requires. You may need to prove that
your chemicals are certified in their concentrations. A certificate
of compliance or some other form of written verification from the
chemistry supplier should cover that requirement.
Good luck with your customer relations. I hope that was helpful.
Linda Corrie
- Orland Park, IL, USA
Sixth of eight simultaneous responses -- May 4, 2007
A Certificate of Analysis (C of A) for the standard EDTA you use
might do for documentation.
Or, you could purchase standard solutions of nickel and tin from a
supply house. 10 g/l solutions, (or 1.33 oz/gal) are available for
use as ICP standards. Then, you could document how your observed
values match up with the true, and generate control charts, if you
like.
Or, you could have a known plating solution prepared by some outside
vendor, and use that the same way.
The common theme is documentation.
|
Dave Wichern
- Bronx, NY, USA
|
Seventh of eight simultaneous responses -- May 4, 2007
Robin
A chemist would not have to ask. This is a serious point. If you are
processing parts for a critical application like pacemaker circuits,
you have to take the control of bath chemistry seriously.
Electroplating is a high tech business and chemical control is
another. Neither can be picked up from books or the internet. I think
you should take advice on bath control from your supplier and/or a
competent analytical chemist.
The direct answer to your question is to buy in certified titration
standards. No chemist would find it cost effective to standardise his
own. It takes time and skill to get accurate results.
|
|
Geoff Smith
Hampshire, England
|
Eighth of eight simultaneous responses -- May 4, 2007
Robin,
One good way is to make lab solutions that mimic your process baths
as close as possible. But make sure that you know the exact metals
concentrations in your lab solutions.
Then titrate these lab solutions and see what your accuracy and
reproducibility is. One big benefit of this approach is that it will
help account for interferences.
Terry Tomt
- Auburn, WA
May 8, 2007
To standardise a titration, you begin with known concentrations of
solutions that you will titrate against each other. This is
fundemental analytical chemistry. All solutions are made up freshly
to precisely known concentrations. The simplest one to do is to
titrate N/10 sulphuric acid against N/10 sodium hydroxide. The
sulphuric acid is the standard and this is used to find teh exact
concentration of sodium hydroxide. The problem with sodium hydroxide
is that is absorbs carbon dioxide from the air to form sodium
carbonate, so the concentration of sodium hydroxide will alter with
time. You need to ensure that the solutions you will use for
titrating the nickel and tin baths are standardised. Decide which
ones are the important ones and then accurately make up known
concentrations of these reagents. Compare them with the relevent
standard solutions suitable for your analyses.
There is, of course, an alternative and that is to use either AA or
ICP analysis. In both cases, start with an accurately known solution
that is about 2-3 times the strength of your working (ie analysis)
samples. Then accuratey dilute this solution a number of times and
use these diluted solutions as your calibration standards of the AA
or ICP. You can then put a sample of your plating solution into the
AA or ICP and see what adsorption you get and compare it to your
calibration graph. In the case of nickel, I suggest you use nickel
sulphate as the standard because nickel chloride can have different
amounts of water of hydration and this will affect your nickel
concentration. Similarly, I would use tin sulphate and not tin
chloride. As a general guide I would recommend you use analytical
standard chemcials, not GPC.
|
|
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist - UK
|
May 12, 2007
I have just read the contributions to date - none of which would
satisfy a chemical process auditor.
Comparing analysis with a standard plating solution is no good - how
do you guarantee the accuracy? At best it monitors precision not
accuracy.
You cannot use either sulphuric acid or sodium hydroxide to prepare
primary standards - both are hygroscopic and NaOH absorbs carbon
dioxide. Acids are standardised against sodium carbonate.
Water weighs 1.00g/ml - but only at 4 degrees C. Glassware is
certified at 20C (27C in tropical climes)
Suggesting AA, IPC or an autotitrator is like buying a Formula 1
racing car for a learner driver - in the unlikely event of actually
getting the thing to work, you just head for disaster that much
faster. (Many people seem to suggest IPC but I have yet to see one in
regular use and AA can explode if you get the flame conditions
wrong!)
To be practical
Get a copy of
"Analysis
of Electroplating and Related Solutions [link is to book info at Amazon; also avail. from
this link at this link at Abebooks ]", Langford, Published by Draper.
Get a copy of any analysis sheets from your plating process
supplier.
Get your balance calibrated; use the levelling device. (If you buy
your titration standards you may not need a balance)
Learn to use a pipette properly - this is important
Buy certified purity chemicals and titration standards
B grade glassware is sufficiently accurate - but it must be
marked.
Record; Method of analysis, bath, date, results,
calculations,additions to the bath, bath dilutions dumps etc.
Plot a graph of concentration for all constituents and investigate
any unexpected fluctuations.
Take a representative sample for analysis; top up the bath to a
standard volume and mix well before taking the sample.
OR - you could just send a regular sample to either your supply house
or an accredited lab for analysis.
|
|
Geoff Smith
Hampshire, England
|


 |
|