| |
Letter 40071
Coating Contributing to Fatigue Failure
of 7075? [California]
March 27, 2006
My company is currently receiving a number of failure reports from
the field on a hydraulic pressure vessel. Analysis of the failure
site (internal threads) has shown that fatigue is the cause.
The part is forged and machined 7075-T73 aluminum. The finish is
called out as Mil-A-8625 [link is to info about spec at TechStreet]
type II anodize, class 1 (not-dyed). I would expect this to yield a
color that is similar to untreated aluminum (gray), however several
of the parts I have received from the field are yellow/gold. There is
an area of the part that is treated per
Mil-C-5541 [link is to info about spec at TechStreet], class 3. I
understand that this type of coating may yield a yellow color. My
assumption is that the entire part has been coated per
MIL-C-5541.
These parts were tested to the theoretical operating conditions
several years ago and passed without a problem. I can only assume
that the part was in fact coated properly at that time.
I have several questions:
1) Are my assumptions about the color of these two coatings
correct?
2) What is the relative affect on fatigue life/strength induced by
the two coatings?
3) Assuming the part was completely coated per MIL-C-5541 instead of
MIL-A-8625, might that have a negative affect on the fatigue
strength?
Greg Holmes
Mechanical Engineer - Aerospace - North Hollywood, CA, USA
March 28, 2006
7075 is alloyed heavily zinc, and it is normal for the anodic
coating to have a gold-like sheen to it after a type 2 process.
Anodizing is a dielectric coating, while the conversion coat is not.
An easy test would be to use an ohmeter, and test for continuity to
see if the part was processed per your specifications. I wouldnt
think that a conversion coating would cause fatigue problems, but
anodizing does, indeed reduce the fatigue strength of aluminum (I
believe it may be as much as 33%, but I'm not sure).
If the coater is anodizing the threads, have him mask them (will
increase your coating cost), or perhaps installing helicoils will
solve your problem.
|
Marc Green
anodizer - Boise, ID, USA
|
April 3, 2006
Thanks for the help. Turns out that the coating is in fact
anodize. Unfortunately, we are required to have the anodize on all
surfaces for corrosion protection. So since we can't increase the
strength by removing the coating, we are currently looking into ways
to reduce the stress in that area of the part.
Greg Holmes
Aerospace - North Hollywood, CA, USA
Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do--
- I want to answer or follow-up on this subject
publicly (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
- My company is a supporting advertiser at
finishing.com and we want the contact information to reach
the inquirer privately.
-
- I want to post a new
question or inquiry of my own on
a different subject.
-
 |
|