| |
Letter 40027
Fluoride determination in HF/Nitric
titanium etches [UK]
March 23, 2006
Hi there
I know that many postings have been made on similar topics, I just
wanted to express my problems in measuring this type of
solution.
We test titanium etch tanks belonging to a leading aero manufacturer,
who use tanks around 2-5% HF and about 20% HNO3.
Current methods used include:
direct measurement with standardised fluoride ISE, which is fairly
time consuming and not really stable;
indirect method by measuring nitrate by IC and subtracting from total
acidity. This involves a large dilution, which adds error, and is
also very time consuming.
We are testing a new method which involves titration against
lanthanum nitrate, which we obtained from Eutech. This works well for
the standard, but unf we can't get an end point for our
samples!
I theorise that, instead of being in solution, the unreacted HF
exists as a complex with titanium fluoride:
6HF + 2Ti -> 2TiF3 + ^3H2
3HF + TiF3 -> H3[TiF6]
As a result no amount of TISAB will free this fluoride from the
complex. To liberate the fluoride from this complex I think you would
need to use something more neucleophilic than fluoride (ie nothing!)
or an ion chromatograph might be powerful enough.
I think the problem may be the definition of free fluoride....
Chris Nattrass
testing services - Nottingham, UK
First of two simultaneous responses -- March 24, 2006
What I do is time consuming, but works. I use the method of
additions, plotting apparent concentration vs. spiked concentrations.
I evaluate the apparent concentrations by making a four point
standard curve with a standard fluoride solution, the points being
50, 100, 200, and 400 ppm. The samples, of course, must be diluted
down into this range.
I don't use Orions version of the method of additions, with their
table of "q" values - quite frankly, I never understood how it
worked, anyway :)
Another alternative is to do a ferrous titration of the nitric acid
in a matrix of sulfuric acid, at ice water tempeatures. This also
works, but uses vast amounts of acid, and a titrant that must be
standardized each and every time you do the test.
The "free" HF vs "total" HF question has never been raised by our
customers (I work for a commercial lab) and I've never brought it up.
Sometimes raising such questions creates problems that have more to
do with salesmanship than science.
|
Dave Wichern
- Bronx, NY, USA
|
Second of two simultaneous responses -- March 24, 2006
You do not want to analyze any of the complexed fluoride. The only
floride that does the work in your tank is the free fluoride.
With ISE, it takes a known dilution of the acid sample to get it into
the area where the mV response is linear.(MANDATORY) Look at the
curve that came with the ISE.
I made a Cal curve from 4 known samples of concentration vs mV and
then tested the diluted sample. Enter the graph with mV that you read
and you have a fairly quick and accurate analyses of the flouride. I
forgot which tisab we used. The purpose of the tisab is a swamping
solution to eliminate the random noise, not to dissolve the fluoride
complex.
James Watts
- FL
Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do--
- I want to answer or follow-up on this subject
publicly (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
- My company is a supporting advertiser at
finishing.com and we want the contact information to reach
the inquirer privately.
-
- I want to post a new
question or inquiry of my own on
a different subject.
-
 |
|