|
Letter 39035
Corrosion caused by incorporation of
drag-out?
++++++
Greetings.
I'm trying to troubleshoot an apparent plating problem manifested
on a tubular bellows-type electroform produced in a commercial shop.
the part consists of a nickel-copper-nickel laminate with an exterior
gold layer. My understanding is that the nickel is produced by the
sulfamate process and the copper is an acid solution. The entire part
is roughly 0.0015" thick and roughly 0.180" diameter. The original
aluminum mandrel is removed with hot hydroxide. Some time after
completion of the part (typically weeks or months) we see the
occasional formation of tiny spots (on the order of 0.001") of
translucent green material
which is apparently exuding from the interior of the laminate through
pores in the exterior gold. elemental analysis suggests that this
material contains nickel, chlorine and oxygen. Empirical comparison
suggests that it might be a hydrated nickel chloride, and I can only
hypothesize that this would be the result of dehydration of entrapped
plating solution, perhaps in areas of anomalously high porosity. I'm
asking if anyone has experience with this phenomenon or something
similar, and if my hypothesis is reasonable, what can be done to
minimize the entrapment?
Steve Yon
medical device OEM - San Diego, CA
----
Editor's apologies! The following photo was provided by Steve with
his original posting but was misfiled until ++++++. So, many
of the replies below were offered without benefit of seeing the photo
the readers are now seeing:
First of three simultaneous responses -- ++++++
More likely corrosion of the underlying nickel through porosity in
the gold. A somewhat thicker gold layer may solve the problem.
|
|
Jeffrey Holmes,
CEF
- Spartanburg, SC, USA
|
Second of three simultaneous responses -- ++++++
Hello Steve,
It sounds as though you did your homework on this problem. Yes, I
have seen solution entrapment cause this very problem. The plater I
was working with at the time had to install air agitation spargers in
the bottom of the 2 rinse tanks after Ni plate and drag out rinse.
They then went into a Ni activator, double cascade rinse, pure Au
strike, then Au plate. It's important that the post Ni rinses are of
a cascading type to minimize Ni concentration. Low current density
areas on the bellows shaped part may also be low in Au plating
thickness causing a porosity problem. Are the spots confined to one
specific area on the parts, or are they sporadic? If they are
sporadic I would suspect rinsing practices. Good luck!
Mark Baker
Process Engineer - Syracuse, New York
Third of three simultaneous responses -- ++++++
Dear Steve,
This may be due to diffusion.Increase thickness of Gold layer. If it
is economically viable,try to plate a flash under coat with palladium
as a barrier layer.
If you think it is due to entrapped Ni soln., then try to introduce a
final DM water rinse with continues flow and vigorous air agitation.
Also increase the rinse time in this tank
Regards
|
|
T.K. Mohan
plating process supplier
Mumbai, India
|
++++++
Thanks for all the insights. if I'm looking at incorporation of
drag-out (i.e. particularly the low pH chlorinated nickel solution),
is it possible that porosity of the nickel could be reduced such that
the
only significant drag-out is superficial and easy to rinse off? how
does one increase density / reduce porosity in a sulfamate nickel?
Steve Yon
- San Diego CA
First of two simultaneous responses -- ++++++
Hello again Steve,
Incorporation of a Ni dragout rinse couldn't hurt. To answer the
second part of your question, as long as you are not co-depositing
contaminant metals on the Ni deposit and rinsing practices are
adequate, corrosion should be nonexistent. The porosity you are
experiencing is coming up through the Gold layer. The least expensive
way to tackle this is to improve rinsing, and as mentioned already by
respondents, is to increase the gold thickness to reduce porosity. In
the unlikely event that none of this works, a pure gold strike under
the final gold plate will help reduce porosity as well. Good luck!
Mark Baker
Process Engineer - Syracuse, New York
Second of two simultaneous responses -- ++++++
Steve
It is not that the nickel layer is porous but the gold layer is
porous. Please read and understand all the answers carefully.
Regards
|
|
T.K. Mohan
plating process supplier
Mumbai, India
|
++++++
The nickel is in fact porous. I've seen it. Pressurizing this part
without the external gold yields a pin-cushion effect ... hundreds of
tiny holes. Adding a gold layer seals the part, apparently by
plugging the holes in the nickel. What has yet to be addressed is the
possibility of incorporation of low pH chlorinated plating fluid
within the apparently open lattice of the nickel layer, and whether
any resulting reaction between this fluid and the metallic nickel can
produce hydrous nickel chloride on exposure to air. Secondarily, what
process changes (e.g. additive / current density) might yield a
denser nickel without the intragranular spaces which (hypothetically)
might be trapping plating fluid?
Steve Yon
- San Diego
++++++
Hi again Steve,
You speak of hydrated Ni Chloride in the lattice. Firstly, Sulfamate
Ni does not contain Ni Chloride. What type of bath is used for the
bellows type electroforming? If it is sulfamate Ni, keeping the pH on
the low end will improve ductility of the deposit, but the current
efficiency drops off some. Get the facts from the Ni bath supplier
regarding the use of leveling and wetting agents. You are not giving
us accurate information on the plating chemistry that is used, so it
is difficult for us to help you.
uses of leveling agents, wetters, etc
Mark Baker
Process Engineer - Syracuse, New York
++++++
The manufacturer tells me that small amounts of chlorine are
added. this is to aid dissolution of the anode material.
Additionally,
Schlesinger and Paunovic clearly state (pg. 173)
that without chlorine, a sulfamate solution requires
sulfur-containing anode material to avoid anodic oxidation of
sulfamate anions. I've had enough materials experience to know that
sulfur incorporated into the electroform produces undesirable
mechanical properties. The 'nickel plating handbook' published by the
OMG group states (and this is mirrored in Schlesinger and Paunovic)
that HYDRATED NICKEL CHLORIDE can be present at up to 10% of the
sulfamate concentration. If you don't know the answer to this
question, fine, but please don't impugn my understanding of the
chemistry or physics.
Steve Yon
- San Diego
++++++
Nobody impugned your knowledge of chemistry or physics, and your
response to a stranger trying to help you is way out of line, Steve.
But at least four electroplating experts are telling you that, based
on the facts on the table, your understanding may be wrong but that
there aren't enough facts on the table yet. Nickel sulfamate plating
baths often have no chlorine in them and rely on sulfurized nickel
anodes for anode corrosion without any of that sulphur being
incorporated into the deposit.
Plato talked of the futility of a man trying to deduce the nature
of reality solely from the play of shadows on a cave wall, and it is
indeed difficult to deduce the nature of a plating problem solely
from a description of some of the features of the finished product.
|
|

Ted Mooney, P.E.
finishing.com
Brick, New Jersey
|
First of three simultaneous responses -- ++++++
Very well put Ted, thank you.
Steve, I respect the knowledge that you have and the material you
have resourced. When you mentioned hydrated Ni chloride and "low pH
chlorinated solution", this leads me to believe it was a nickel
sulfate solution that was being used. I admit I don't have all the
answers, I just try to help fellow platers utilizing the information
that is furnished in the inquiry. I hope you solve the problem.
Mark Baker
Process Engineer - Syracuse, New York
Second of three simultaneous responses -- ++++++
Steve/Mark/Ted
Steve wrote
Quote
"What has yet to be addressed is the possibility of incorporation of
low pH chlorinated plating fluid within the apparently open lattice
of the nickel layer, and whether any resulting reaction between this
fluid and the metallic nickel can produce hydrous nickel chloride on
exposure to air. Secondarily, what process changes (e.g. additive /
current density) might yield a denser nickel without the
intragranular spaces which (hypothetically) might be trapping plating
fluid?
Steve Yon
- San Diego"
Unquote
Steve,
I do not think u can possibly incorporate low pH(other than the pH of
the plating bath,in the plating bath)plating fluid.If at all it is
possible,then u have to incorporate it on the outside of the plated
surface.It can be Nickel chloride and HCl mixture which will give
lower pH.As such a reaction is probably not possible to produce
hydrous NiCl2 on exposure to air to fill in the pore.
All these sound good as hypothetical answer to your hypothetical
question.
regards,
|
|
T.K. Mohan
plating process supplier
Mumbai, India
|
Third of three simultaneous responses -- ++++++
As another followup, although I am not familiar with
gold/nickel/copper/nickel electroforms, I am familiar with single
layer nickel electroforms that are helium-tight. So it occurs to me
that it is probably a problem indicating faulty electroforming if
these bellows are like pincushions until the gold plating.
 |

Ted Mooney
finishing.com
Brick, New Jersey |
Dear Reader, please --
- Answer or follow-up on this subject (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
- My company is a supporting advertiser at
finishing.com and we want the contact information to reach
the inquirer privately.
-
- Post a new
question or inquiry on a different subject.
-
 |