|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Letter 35405
|
|
|
Robert H Probert Editor's
note: |
Robert, I believe that, while your numbers might be correct, your
conclusions are the reverse of what is correct.
Is not Guillermo's conclusion correct, and the aluminium will corrode
while the copper will not corrode?
![]() |
Bill Reynolds |
The aluminum is "anodic protected". The Anode "gives", the cathode
"receives".
When you anodize 2024 the copper plates out (but may not bond), onto
the cathode (aluminum or lead or stainless steel).
In this case the copper dissolves away from the higher potential and
tries to plate on (and may not bond) to the lower potential.
|
|
Robert H Probert Editor's
note: |
I must continue to disagree, Robert. You're trying to turn the
whole electrochemical series on its head by saying that the more
noble metal corrodes while the less noble metal gives
protection.
The reactions that may occur in anodising, where a large
voltage/current runs through an electrolyte between two dissimilar
metals that are not otherwise joined, are not relevant to the case
described by Pauric Hennessy. He proposes simply clamping aluminium
and copper together and wonders if there will be corrosion of one or
the other. As Guillermo says, in the presence of humidity, the
aluminium will corrode, as per the electrochemical series.
Will somebody else please buy into this discussion? Am I missing
something that Robert sees, or is Robert seeing something that isn't
actually there?
![]() |
Bill Reynolds |
Aluminium is often used to protect copper water pipes from pitting. The aluminium is referred to as a sacrificial anode, as it will dissolve under these conditions. That makes the aluminium anodic and the copper cathodic. However, aluminium is usually covered in a protective and tenacious metal oxide that significantly shifts the oxidation potential of the "aluminium"; actually the potential in this case will be that of the aluminium oxide. Exactly how the aluminium-copper system will corrode will depend on the environment it is in. If the chemical environment promotes failure of the aluminium oxide layer, then the aluminium will corrode, if it does not, the copper MAY corrode.
|
|
Trevor Crichton |
Now, I´m more confused. Is it correct that aluminum oxide is dielectric or non conductive? If so, how could it have a position in the galvanic series? The only possibility I see is that there are pores in the oxide layer produced by anodizing an aluminum surface. Someone please comment in this direction. Guillermo Marrufo.
Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
Ever since Mr. Probert started noting here that anodized aluminum is non conductive (which goes back a couple of years now), and which was something I always knew but hadn't really thought through, I've noticed the many outdoor applications of anodized aluminum fastened with stainless steel bolts, or u-bolted to galvanized metal, etc. And my observation has been that this seems to cause little galvanic corrosion problem in most cases. If the anodized coating were broken where it meets with the other metal, I guess it would be a problem. But if the anodized coating is broken elsewhere than at the connection, there still would be no metallic conductive path and apparently no galvanic corrosion. So it's good theory and born out by experience.
But as for this particular question, Mssrs. Reynolds and Crichton must surely be right: aluminum is the base metal that corrodes and copper is the noble metal that is protected.
|
|
|
Gentlemen:
From an everyday application and interaction of metals standpoint, we
build MRI room [Faraday Cages.]
The most common observation has been that in the absence of special
finishes, in an intentionally conductive application, the copper will
always corrode the alumium. To prevent/delay the reaction, we
normally sandwich stainless components depending on the application
to safe guard the aluminum leaving it now solely exposed to moisture
effects.
So in magnetic fields and ground isolated rooms, the metal nobility
relationship seems to always rule the day.
I hope this helps a little to clarify which metal would otherwise
always corrode on contact.
Luis G. Botero
- Riverside, CA, USA

Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2009 finishing.com