Letter 32469

Melonite vs Tennifer on semi-auto pistol slides

++++

Where would I find a Side by side comparison of Burlington's Melonite Process and the German Tennifer Process? I am often involved in arguments regarding the these two finishes on Smith & Wesson and Walther forums. Both Companies produce a version of the same Walther Designed 99 pistol (Walther Tennifer over Steel and Smith amp;& Wesson Melonite over Stainless steel.) Because of the success and reputation Tennifer gained after the Glock Pistols were introduced to the U.S. market some years ago, Tennifer seems to have gained the reputation of a indestructible miracle finish unable to be duplicated in America. I say this attitude is wrong and American finishers know just about as much about super hard firearms finishes as the Germans on their best day. Smith & Wesson didn't just pull Melonite out of a hat. The Engineers at Smith & Wesson knew that Melonite over Stainless, was a pretty advanced finish for Firearms slides. So help me out guys. I may be right. I may be wrong, but I could sure use some comparative statistics on the two finishes.

Jim Davis
Hobbyist - Enid, Oklahoma

From what I understand - Teniffer can't be applied in the US because the EPA won't allow it.

I was a project manager for a manufacturing facility - and we wanted "tennifer" like qualities applied to some steel parts - and after tracking down the facilities in Europe that apply the tennifer finish (it is not a Glock exclusive) - those companies told us they couldn't set up shop in the US because the EPA wouldn't allow the teniffer process to be done here.

So - that would make the "Melonite" process different - as it can be done in the US. How different - I have no idea. More importantly - if there is any *practical* difference between the finishes?? That is the $64,000 dollar question...that I don't know the answer to.

Jones
- Odgen, Utah

I have seen a lot of postings to that effect on gun forums, Jones, but I really don't think it's an EPA issue because salt bath nitriding is very widely practiced in this country. I still believe it's a licensing issue and that those shops may have been bending the truth a wee bit.

I would suggest that anyone who is interested in this process may wish to speak to Brian Radford of Kolene (a supporting sponsor of finishing.com, located at http://www.finishing.com/Equipment/kolene.shtml, or at least review their paper on the QPQ process at http://www.finishing.com/kolene/qpq/index.html.

Ted Mooney finishing.com Brick, New Jersey

MELONITE IS ANOTHER WORD FOR TENIFER. THEY ARE THE SAME EXACT THING! YOU CAN DOUBLE CHECK MY ANSWER BY SIMPLY TYPING "MELONITE ENCYCLOPEDIA" ON THE GOOGLE SEARCH AND BE ABLE TO LOOK IT UP YOURSELF FOR VERIFICATION.

Christopher Deleon
- Palm Beach, Florida

Thanks, Christopher

At www.durferrit.com/en/unternehmen/firmengeschichte.htm, Houghton Durferrit -- formerly part of DeGusa, but now a division of H.E.F. -- claims both trademarks and says they are the same thing. If they own the tradenames as they claim, they are free to decide how the processes are done, including whether they are identical or not, just as Ford has been free to make a "Thunderbird" a 2-seat sports car, a 4-seat luxury car, or a 6-seat family sedan to suit changing times.

Similarly, the same page claims that the Tenifer and Melonite process "has undergone continuous development with regard to its regenerability and ecology". So neither is quite what it was in the past.

Ted Mooney finishing.com Brick, New Jersey

The only difference in the "Tennifer" process and "Melonite" is the brand name.
But the original German formulation for the "Tennifer" carbonitriding salt bath used 60% sodium cyanide and cyanate and 40% potassium cyanide and cyanate.... That's why the EPA wouldn't let anyone do it here.
The process has to be cyanide free here.
As far as I can find out, some places in Europe are still using cyanide salts.

Mmmmm....smell the vapor coming from that vat of molten sodium cyani..i...... thud!

Edward Baltzer
- Birmingham, Alabama

Thanks, Edward, but can you quote an EPA reg that says this? I'm not saying you are wrong, but I am saying that we've received countless postings saying "the EPA doesn't allow . . ." that have been in error.

Ted Mooney finishing.com Brick, New Jersey

The Tenifer process is not exclusive to Glock. In fact SAAB of Sweden once used the same process for it's cam and crankshafts. The main difference between the Tenifer and Melonite processes is a matter of splitting hairs. I believe that it is simply an EPA issue, in two seperate processes, each having the same end result.

Jeremy Shank
- Atlanta, Georgia

Okay, so if these two processes are the same, how come I've seen Smith and Wesson firearms that are Melonite treated rust/corrode, but Tennifer doesn't? A friend of mine has carried both guns concealed and his Glock 26 never rusted, but his M&P 9 compact did? Through practical experience, I have to disagree that they are the same. They react differently when they are placed in the same environment.

Todd Heimann
- Cincinnati, Ohio

Just because they are the same finish doesn't mean they are applied the same way. Company X might have done a bad job of applying the product. Perhaps they had a bad batch of the product?

Levi Gresser
- Baltimore, Maryland

Thanks in advance,
My question regards the Melonite/tenifer debate and actually is quite simple. My understanding of this salt nitriding acid bath process is that it doesn't translate well to stainless alloys, that it actually weakens their ability to withstand corrosion? Would this perhaps explain why were seeing the S&W product developing oxidation?

Chris Edwards
- Roseville, Minnesota