|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Letter 30658 How does copper sulfate test for passivation work? [Indiana](2004) Dear Readers, I have heard that a way to check for iron on the surface of a passivated stainless steel part is with the copper sulfate test. From what I can gather the copper replaces the iron due to the fact that the iron is more easily oxidized. Chromium is more easily oxidized than iron, so why doesn't the copper also replace the chromium? Thanks for your input. Shaun C [name deleted for privacy]
(2004) Chromium and nickel will not be replaced with the Copper sulfate test solution (which also contains sulfuric acid), only the Fe or other less noble metals. If there is free iron on the surface it will be replaced by the copper, forming the distinctive copper color on the surface in this 6 minute test. Of course, this test should only be used on austenitic stainless steel. Some people use it on other grades, but you can get false failures.
(2005) Why is it that Fe is less noble than Chromium? From their locations it appears that Iron is more noble. Chris L [name deleted for privacy] April 16, 2008 I need to determine effectiveness (pass/fail) of an up-coming passivation procedure. I have read that using copper sulfate is a proper method, however, I have not found a test kit, only the copper sulfate itself. How do I go about constructing a procedure or test method? John Stiglbauer
May 4, 2008 To answer John's question, I'd look up a standard test and use
that, rather than make my own. Primarily because I'm lazy, but you
can also argue that something published by a known organization
probably has had some thought behind it, maybe it's been vetted as
well.
Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do--
![]() |
|
Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2008 finishing.com