|
|
![]() (Cycles thru suppliers) |
|
![]() |
Letter 27057
|
|
|
Anders Sundman |
Difference between regular chrome and Thin Dense Chrome goes beyond what Specifications cover. It is related to chemistry, current density, temperature, etc. The deposit is also different regarding physical and mechanical properties, the later being basically harder and without cracks. It is, to my knowledge, a proprietary modification of a regular chrome bath.
Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
I agree with the comments made by Mr. Marrufo: thin dense
certainly has different characteristics. However, there seems to be a
lack of support by platers as to a standard for this plating. It
would seem that AMS 2436^AMS2438C should eliminate discussion
although acceptance seems lacking. AMS 2460^AMS2406 is the replacement for AMS
QQ-C-320, yet when I specify Class 1, Type I, .0001 thick with a
nickel underplate I get nothing but "no bids." The parts I'm plating
are steel and the prospect platers will only plate directly on the
steel (regardless of the spec). Does anyone plate Class 1, Type I,
and what is the proper standard to ensure I get thin dense and not
just decorate bumper chrome?
Dan Drummond
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
----
Ed. note: "AMS 2436" appears to be a typo, Dan, as that is a spec for
"Coating, Aluminum Oxide Detonation Deposition".
Yes, these numbers are both incorrect and I'm not sure how that happened. AMS 2438C (Plating, Chromium, Thin, Hard, Dense Deposit) is a definitive specification for thin dense chrome. The replacement for AMS-QQ-C-320 is AMS 2460 (Plating, Chromium) and seems more acceptable to platers as it doesn't carry the testing requirements defined in AMS 2438C.
Dan Drummond
- Ann Arbor, Michigan

Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2009 finishing.com