(Cycles thru suppliers)


Letter 27045

Why use AMS QQ P 35 for aerospace instead of ASTM A 967? [Ireland] 

++++

Due to the canceling of QQ P 35 two alternatives were given, does anyone know the reason for using AMS QQ-P-35C [link is to info about spec at TechStreet] for aerospace instead of ASTM A-967 [link is to info about spec at TechStreet]-99? I guess what I'm asking is what is the difference between the two specs?

James Geary
Quality manager - Dublin, Santry, Ireland


Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do--

I want to answer or follow-up on this subject publicly (in non-commercial fashion).
 
My company is a supporting advertiser at finishing.com and we want the contact information to reach the inquirer privately.
 
I want to post a new question or inquiry of my own on a different subject.
 





     

 Save This Page (why?)    -    Home    -    ©1995-2008 finishing.com