|
Letter 15084
Bubbled Ni-P [Missouri]
++
We are experiencing problems with bubbling plating for an
automotive part made from 6262 extruded. The plating is Ni-P. When
the part returns from the plater we are sorting for bubbling plating
on the ID. We are experiencing about an 8% fallout.
However, during our final audit, after parts sit in inventory for
a short length of time, we discover more bubbled plating. Is it
possible for bubbling to appear after the parts sit in inventory for
a certain length of time? This is puzzling as I have checked the
sorters' performance and trust they are doing a thorough job.
Ken Tharp
- St. Louis, MO
++
If possible, do a low temperature bake, and catch all the bad
parts the first time around.
|
|

Ted Mooney, P.E.
finishing.com
Brick, NJ
|
First of two simultaneous responses ++
Ken,
Yes, it is possible for bubbles to keep developing with time.
Corrosion takes time to proceed and sometimes forms products that
have a larger volume than the original elements (salts, gases, etc.)
So, if it happens say in a pore, that was in your substrate below the
impervious, thin plate, the consecuence is a bubble. Remedy: Better
substrate and plating quality control
Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico
Second of two simultaneous responses ++
There are many parameters that control the adhesion of EN to
aluminum substrates. Ignore or be unaware of just one of these
parameters and you will have blisters or marginal adhesion that will
lead to blistering down the road.
First of two simultaneous responses ++
Adhesion testing is an imperfect science. One can sample to detect
if process is flawed, however, can't inspect 100% of lot over 100% of
surface of all parts to ensure lot is "blister free."
8% bubbled at receiving should be a clear signal that something
with your plater's process or their chemistry or your base metal is
awry. Electroless nickel, especially when it gets over a couple of
tenths thick can mask poor adhesion due to the "enveloping" effect.
As the EN is hard, it wraps around the part and won't lift or
separate for a period of time (unless thermally or mechanically or
otherwise encouraged to lift sooner!). This is what the traditional
bake after EN plate is for, to induce blistering so poor or marginal
adhesion becomes apparent.
There is a very good ASTM spec for preparing aluminum for plating
(either B253-87 [link is to info about spec at TechStreet] or
B254-92 [link is to info about spec at TechStreet] ) that has
various methods. All aluminum alloys can't be treated by a single
process and variations are required depending on the specific alloy
you're using. In general, plating on 6000-series aluminum is less
problematic than say 7000 or 2000 aluminums. Non-alkaline cleaning,
minimal etching without caustic, double zincating, and barrier EN
striking are some suggestions for trying.
Good luck... aluminum is at best tricky. If Anoplate can assist
you in your trails or evaluating actual parts, please get in touch.
Second of two simultaneous responses ++
You did not give info regarding your plating process but I have a
feeling that you do not use a high PH EN prior to your low PH EN.
When plating on Al, it is highly recommended to use two EN
solutions, a high PH one as a flash (does not attack the zincate
layer) and then an ordinary EN with PH 4.8.
|
|
Sara
Michaeli
chemical process supplier
Israel
|
Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do.
- I want to post a
question or inquiry of my
own.
-
- I want to answer or follow-up on this question
publicly (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
- I am a supporting advertiser and want to
reach
the inquirer privately.
 |