|
|
|
![]() |
Letter 13089 Cadmium vs. Zinc vs. Nickel Plating Comparison
We are currently looking for an alternative to cadmium plated parts. The argument for an "equivalent" to cadmium plate has been going round and round. The parts are threaded assemblies and maintaining tight dimensions is critical to the operation of the assembly. We were getting a .2 Cadmium plate (commercial grade). The alternatives appear to be Zinc plating or Nickel Plating. Tin-Zinc plating is not an option with our current vendor. With Zinc, the interaction with metals and the sacrificial nature are issues. The corrosive by-products may cause operation issues in the threads and other tight areas. The base material is SA-1983-B7 Steel. Can anyone offer any insight to this? The consensus opinion is that Nickel plating offers better corrosion resistance than Zinc. The plater says the Zinc doesn't offer any less protection than the Cadmium plate. I'm just shooting for something comparable to the Cadmium. Any advice/opinions are greatly appreciated. Brian Bukoski
Brian, You said that Tin / Zinc is out of the question. How some of the other alloy deposits such as Zinc / Nickel which seems to be the best of your two worlds, will give you some of the best of both zinc and nickel deposits. In my opinion Zinc is not as good as Cadmium for corrosion although the chromate are. The nickel deposit will give you superior corrosion but will loose lubricity, nickel deposits tend to be much harder. It is impossible to replace all the properties of Cadmium with one deposit, but with some research you can get what you have need for. Chris Snyder
The finish that will work well for you is Alkaline Zn/Ni 12-16% Ni. This process with a yellow chromate will give at least 1000 hours NSS to white rust and 2500 hours to red rust (assuming 8 microns minimum). The product produces very little in the way of white corrosion products and has excellent slip properties. Hope that helps. Regards, Jonathan Timms
The topic of Cadmium replacement finishes has been ongoing since '95, when the final regulations in the automotive came to light. Many finishes were tested, and very few offer all of the benefits of Cadmium. Metal Coatings just completed a Cad Replacement Study with the US Army, in which our coatings (both chrome-containing and chrome-free versions) were chosen as the best performing alternatives for Cad. They offer most, if not all, of the benefits of Cad, but they are water-based and environmentally friendly. The areas looked at were: cosmetic corrosion, galvanic corrosion (including pit depth and pitted volume), torque-tension (including clampload at 90 ft-lbs, break-loose torque, and torque range), thickness, conductivity and cost. Tin Zinc and Zinc + Yellow were tested in this study and did not compare to the Dacromet(r) and Geomet(r) products. They showed excessive white/red corrosion very early in testing, and there was a large amount of pitting caused by the bimetallic cell (the bolts were tested assembled to an Al fixture). Also, the Army didn't consider Zn Nickel for this study because it did not perform well in their preliminary studies. At the very base of the results of this study was to not consider Zinc Plating + Yellow Chromate as an alternative to Cadmium. Andrew R. Pfeifer
March 28, 2007 Cadmium is a great corrosion inhibitor, however we're finding that
a properly plated piece of iron with tin-zinc outperforms the best
cadmium plating job. Roger Fasting
November 30, 2007 I would like to know which coating is better Zinc Coating or Nickel Coating. Which one of the two will provide better corrosion resistance, surface finish. Bhavneet Singh
December 4, 2007 If one coating were just plain better than the other, nobody would ever use the other, Bhavneet. As mentioned above, the corrosion resistance of zinc will be better in many instances. That's because zinc is anodic to steel and can sacrificially protect it, whereas nickel is not anodic to steel but cathodic. But nickel is self-leveling and will certainly give a better "surface finish". Please describe the actual component you are thinking about plating, and then people may be able to give you an assessment based on the function and the environment it will be exposed to. Thanks!
February 26, 2008 We are looking for a suitable replacement for the zinc coating found on some of our parts. The reason being is zinc's reaction with Polyamides 6 or 66 (reference GM's Worldwide standard- GMW3044). Would nickel plating act as a suitable replacement as far as friction properties are concerned? Rick Leslie
January 22, 2009 i have a 98 Cadillac deville...I'm looking to replace all rotors...its just for daily driving and NOT very aggressive driving...which plating is better for this application? zinc or cadmium? Brian johnson
January 28, 2009 Hi, Brian. Cadmium is a cumulative biotoxin much like Lead and Mercury. It's use is forbidden in many countries, and it should only be used where it's unique combination of properties (most of which are listed above) is required. Because rotors can be satisfactory without cadmium plating, they should not (in my opinion) be cadmium plated. Regards,
![]() |
|
Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2009 finishing.com