| |
letter 53534
Passivation / Electropolishing : Can we
describe the atomic mechanisms/chemistry in detail here?
[California]
November 4, 2009
Hello,
I'm a materials engineer working in the medical device sector. When I
first started working with metallic implants 5 years ago I was
charged with setting up an electropolishing process, passivation
follow up process, as well as corrosion testing of the finished
parts. I recall at the time doing massive amounts of research online
trying to understand what was actually happening during these
processes on an atomic level. Eventually my searches led me to this
forum where I found the most detailed and informative responses in
archived threads. The general ideas I took away from my research at
the time were:
-Electropolishing is a pretty well understood process wherein a
viscous film is formed on the surface of the part when given an
anodic potential. The film is thinner at microscopic peaks and
thicker at microscopic valleys which enables preferential diffusion
of the peaks, resulting in a net smoothing effect. Although agitation
is typically used during the process, the film will typically be drug
out of the tank and must be rinsed away, after which an robust oxide
layer forms on the surface when exposed to air [not sure if the oxide
layer actually forms in the bath (?) ]
-Passivation (I'll confine the discussion to nitric acid) is used to
remove any free iron or other concentrated elements from the surface
that may be left during electropolishing. When the part is removed
from the nitric acid bath the oxide layer forms from contact with air
and will be even more robust than if EP only...assuming the
possibility of free iron.
Now to my questions:
1) Is my general recollection of how these processes work accurate?
If not, where am I off?
2) How come when I now search these forums I see many threads saying
that there is no engineering reason for passivation? From my personal
experience, both the rest potential and breakdown potential of EP +
Passivated parts is improved compared to EP alone. These results were
observed in cyclic polarization curves that may not be relevant in
most of the industrial applications on cited on this forum...
3) I'm now at a new company and not directly responsible for the
EP/Passivate processing. The manufacturing engineers are claiming
improved surface quality when they passivate BEFORE EP. This struck
me as odd because I'm sure the passivated surface is removed
completely by the EP process BUT could this make sense if the
passivation process is acting like a pickling where the benefit would
be as a surface prep before EP?
Am I way off here?
RJ Bennett
Materials Engineer - Medical Device - Temecula, CA, USA

November 5, 2009
Anytime that you do 2 different surface improvements, you will
have a tiny bit better product.
As a scarred warrior of difference of opinions within a company,
strongly consider that it will only make a tiny difference in the
final product. If they are happy with doing it backwards, smile and
go along with it.
Properly operated EP is a great process by itself.
James Watts
- FL
First of two simultaneous responses -- November 17, 2009
1. Yes, more or less you are correct. Citric acid passivation
works the same way as nitric does, and of course passivation can be
done without EP.
2. The need for passivation depends on the grade of stainless used
and what kind of environment it will be placed in. There may be "no
engineering reason for passivation" in certain instances, but that's
not valid as a generality.
3. You are correct, it should be EP then passivation, though any
needed surface prep before the EP should be done. That wouldn't
really be passivation then, it would be pickling as you said. Many
people still use the terms interchangeably, especially since nitric
baths are used for both.
Either EP or passivation are good for corrosion resistance, both
together is even better.
Second of two simultaneous responses -- November 18, 2009
Your comments about electropolishing are broadly correct, the only
point I would raise is that when the workpiece is removed from the
electroplishing bath, it may become covered in another layer besides
oxides, namely phosphates or any other anions present in the
electropolishing solution. The purpose of electropolishing is to
create an equipotential over the metal surface; this inhibits the
creation of corrosion cells as no Redox reaction can take place.
Obviously in metals such as stainless steel, this is not possible,
but nevertheless, the electropolishing process does still reduce the
possibility of any local cells being created.
Regarding the use of passivation prior to electropolishing - The
passivation will help reduce corrosion prior to electropolishing, but
it will certainly be of no use after electropolishing - it will have
been removed or damaged. In fact, passivation may even be detrimental
to the passivation process and it will inhibit the electrochemical
reactions form taking place, so there will be uneven and incomplete
electropolishing. Post electropolishing passivation would be
beneficial, but it may result in the surface becoming duller, which
is possibly not what is wanted.
|
|
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist - UK
|
-
-
 |