| |
51089
Need 0.001" zinc plating on MS screws, even
the heads
January 29, 2009
We require 25 microns ( 0.001" ) zinc plating on iron
screws.
In a trial lot working on 7 volts with acid zinc barrel plating for 4
hours on 6 kg screws ( taking 75 - 80 amp current ) we got reading of
27 microns on a small 1" square plate got plated along with screws.
Laboratory also confirms 27 microns on plate.
Will the round head of screw will also contain the same microns or
not ?
Asheesh Kumar
Plating shop - New Delhi, India

February 26, 2009
I have been thinking about this a little bit...
If I think about it in theory...
6 kg of screws... maybe 16 dm2 per kg... but you should definitely
check your exact surface area as with screws it might be a much
higher surface area than the above number.
For Acid Zinc...
um per minute = i * 0.285
where i = current density in ASD (amperes per square decimeter)
You have 80 amps with 96 dm2 so you have around 0.8 ASD.
So you get 0.2375 um per minute.
25 um / 0.2375 um per minute = 105 minute plating time
HOWEVER... the heads might be a low current density area and there
might take longer to get the 25 um minimum.
The "plate" you have in the barrel load possibly has a lower current
density than the threads and sharp edges of your screws. And I am not
sure that the "plate" is a good reflection of the current density
that your parts receive.
To be absolutely certain... I recommend to measure the "head" with an
X-Ray if this is possible (maybe these screws are too small). If the
screws are too small... you might put in a larger screw that can be
measured by X-Ray as this screw might be more reflective of the
"true" current density that your small screws receive.
I hope I have been more helpful than confusing... : )
Thomas E. Kidd
- Budapest, Hungary
February 27, 2009
For very heavy thicknesses, electroplating is hardly the finish of
choice. On the high current density areas, the deposit will not be
very ductile; it will flake off producing "stardust," as some platers
call it. In addition, it will be in the electroplating line a long,
long time. A far better choice would be mechanical plating, which has
better economics over about 0.0005" to 0.0007".
-
-
 |