|
Letter 5084
Aluminum bearing surfaces...hardening,
ball bearings, Teflon?
.
I am working on an aircraft structure related problem and need
some input. First, some general info. Imagine two thin 1/8" thick
rings one inch wide (Aluminum), 33" diameter approx, one inside the
other, concentric, with the inner surface of the outer ring bearing
on the outer surface of the inner ring. Essentially, this is a
bearing--they need to rotate around the common axis. I need a low
friction (coefficient less than .2), minimal particulate,
non-lubricated surfacant of some sort between them.
I have looked at Teflon coatings a little, but here is my concern:
there is a fairly good potential of misalignment or thermal effects
which would cause binding (not to mention whether these can even be
machined round enough). If I were to groove both rings (and maybe
thicken the rings and gap between so the surfaces don't directly bear
on eachother) and insert ball bearings, what process would harden the
aluminum grooves to accept the harder bearings? Input would be great!
ly appreciated...
Rob Berger
- Tulsa, Oklahoma
.
Hard anodize that is teflon impregnated might work. Chrome plating
will last longer (my opinion) but is very hard to be uniform around
sharp corners. Would probably have to be ground afterwards. My idea
of best would be 0.0015 of electroless nickel, low phosphorous and
heat treated. Boron EN is slightly better, but it costs more and
there are less job shops that can do it.
If you are paranoid about lubrication, there are several shops
that do Teflon-EN. This is entrapped tiny teflon particles in the EN
matrix, so it does not "wear off". This will be a mid phos, but with
the extra lubrication, it should not be a problem
James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
.
We have been having very good success depositing chromium nitride
on aluminum surfaces. The coating adheres very well (can't be removed
using standard scratch adhesion tests), has a hardness around 2200
HK, and can be deposited at temperatures as low as 120 C -- we put it
on 7075 aluminum alloy and found no deterioration of the mechanical
properties of the aluminum. In simple wear tests against a tungsten
carbide ball it has shown to be around 100 times more wear resistant
than 7075 aluminum. Our deposition system is large enough to coat
your parts, if you wish to try it.

Jim Treglio
- San Diego, California
Dear Reader, please --
- Post a
question on a different subject.
-
- Answer or follow-up on this subject (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
 |