| |
48000
Galvanizing ash or flux contamination of
work
February 28, 2008
Greetings from Australia. After long holdups largely related to
the shocking price of zinc, the hotdip galvanizing plant that I've
previously posted about is up and running.
9 metre long tanks and kettle, hot caustic, hot inhibited sulfuric,
hot quad flux, lead bottom kettle with 30 ppm aluminium in the zinc,
quench. First batch of 190 items wired to a frame, total weight about
1.5 tonne, 100% acceptable.
But not perfect, hence this post.
Flux is allowed to dry, so work enters zinc with not a sign of
spatter. Starting about 5 seconds after immersion and lasting about
10 seconds, slight bubbling which I assume is the flux doing its
work. Surprisingly large amount of white smoke.
But within seconds of the slight bubbling, we got a thin film of
light-coloured fines over the bath. When the work was withdrawn, this
film was picked up by the top surfaces of the jobs giving a rough
surface to the zinc coating on those top surfaces. The rest of each
job was completely clean, as each job came up through the clear patch
created by its top surface.
A quick run over with a hand grinder cleaned the roughness off, but
the film shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Possibilities that have occurred to me are (a) fine dross suspended
in the bath from the original meltdown and pushed to the surface by
the flux on the jobs; (b) quad flux reacting with aluminium in the
bath, more than would happen with triple salt flux - the great amount
of white smoke suggests the possibility of aluminium chloride. The
film was still on the surface of the kettle 12 hours later, with the
clear areas still in it from where the jobs had come out.
But these are only thoughts about what might be the nature and cause
- I hope somebody can suggest what actually is the nature and cause,
so that we can stop it happening.
|
Bill Reynolds
consultant metallurgist
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
|
|
|
February 29, 2008
Bill
the bubbling after immersion sounds quite normal.
The white smoke sounds normal. Part of the flux is ammonium
chloride - thats what fumes off. The higher the ratio the
worse it is. Quadraflux most fume, triple next, double less
etc. But don't let that cause you to think that quadra is no
good, its actually good.
You didn't mention skimming before withdrawl.
Its normal to get ash float to the top during that bubbling.
Residues of oxides etc. While material is immersed, you use
a thin bladed skimmer on a handle to paddle (not
vigourously) the ash to one end of the kettle, pushing it
between the suspenstion wires. This creates a clean surface
to withdraw through, without the ash etc depositing on the
work.
In other words, creat a "clear patch" of the whole surface,
then withdraw.
|
Geoff Crowley
galvanizing &
powder coating shop
Glasgow, Scotland
|
February 29,
2008
Sir:
Have you had the zinc tested for aluminum? 30 ppm
aluminum(e.g. 0.003% is quite normal). How many kg of
"brightener bar" (usually 10% Al) was added and how many kg
of zinc are in the kettle?
How many kg of quadraflux did you add and how many liters
are in the flux tank? What is the baume' of the flux and
what is the temperture? You are correct, quadraflux gives
almost not zinc spatter as the steel enters the zinc.
Did you skim off the ash just before pulling the product out
of the kettle? What type of skimmer do you use?
There is no dross initially in the zinc, the iron is fully
dissolved in the zinc for at least a few days or even a few
weeks. Quadaflux does not react more with aluminum than does
triple salt. I do agree that the great amount of white smoke
indicates aluminum (and too much of it in the zinc). At
start-up it is often the case that too much aluminum is
added due to a math error.
Regards,
March 2, 2008
Sir:
Over the weekend, I thought of a few questions that I wanted
to ask you: 1)How many liters do you have in your sulfuric
pickle tank? How many liters of concentrated sulfuric acid
did you add to this tank? How many liters of inhibitor did
you add to this tank? From what country did you buy the
inhibitor? How are the acid fumes in the plant? Are the acid
fumes: Very Slight, Moderate, Strong, or Very Strong. 2)How
are you heating the sulfuric acid tank and to what
temperature? 3)How are you heating the quadraflux solution
and to what temperature? 4)What is the heating system for
the kettle? Is it flat-flame-side-fired, end-fired, or
pulsed-end-fired? How many centimeters of insulation are
under the kettle (e.g. between the kettle bottom and the
concrete support pad)? How many thermocouples are in the
kettle and are they in the zinc or on the outside of the
kettle wall?
Your observation that the quadrafluxed steel goes into the
molten zinc "...with not a sign of spatter...." is exactly
correct. This is also my experience and it is interesting
that a drying oven is NOT required and in fact NOT
desirable.
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
|
March 3, 2008
Hi Geoff and Thomas
Thank you both for your responses. In our innocence, we anticipated
that a clean zinc surface going in would give a clean zinc surface
coming out - the concept of needing to skim while immersed hadn't
occurred to us. Your advice, Geoff, goes direct to the heart of our
problem.
The tanks and kettles are 9 metres to accommodate the large beams and
columns that will be part of the work load. But on our first
production batch we used all small items (190 of them), not long
beams etc, and wired them to use the full area of the lifting frame
and kettle. Paddling between the wires in such a case is just not
practicable. Under other circumstances, with several large jobs on
the frame instead of hundreds of small ones, skimming between the
wires would be easily enough done.
My thoughts now are to both reduce the amount of flux on the work and
avoid skimming between the wires, by...
(1) add a surfactant (pentaerythritol?) to the flux to get better
draining and hence less flux on the work;
(2) try coming out of the flux at creep speed rather than normal
hoist speed (same slow speed as coming out of the zinc) and see if
that also gives less flux on the work;
(3) on small work, use only half the length of the kettle - go in
clean at one end then move the frame to the other end while
immersed.
Do these sound sensible intentions?
I chose to use quad flux right from the start in the light of Dr
Cook's many postings and publications on the subject of fluxes, and
hope to be able to stay with it (or at worst somewhere between triple
and quad).
The details that Dr Cook requested about the other aspects of plant
operation seem not to impact on our surface crud problem. All the
maths were right, and the caustic, sulfuric and flux tanks are all
run at 70 degrees C and are not giving any problems. The kettle has
220 tonnes zinc + 24 tonnes lead, is pulse-end-fired and held at
448-450 degrees C. Aluminium is added as 10 kg bars of 4% aluminium
(diecasting) alloy.
Thanks again, and we'll be grateful for your comment on this post.
|
Bill Reynolds
consultant metallurgist
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
|
|
|
March 4, 2008
Geoff,
You say something like "quadraflux is actually good." Do you
use it? If so what baume,' what ACN, and what temperature?
If you do not use quadraflux what do you use? Do you have
kettle enclosures?
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
March 4, 2008
Bill,
Your very clear description of the problem allowed a quick
solution.
You need not reinvent flux usage. What is the density of
your flux (in Baume' or g/mL measured at room temp.) If you
get too little flux on the product it will not galvanize. If
you get too much flux, the outer layer will be dry and the
inner layer wet and spatter badly at the kettle. If your
purpose in reducing flux on the steel is to reduce smoke
(white smoke that rapidly travels upward) you cannot "win."
With heavy baume' double salt you get brown/black heavy
smoke at head height and it does not dissipate rapidly. With
triple or quadraflux you get white smoke that goes straight
up to the roof and out any open doors. The real solution to
the smoke problem is a kettle enclosure and bag house.
1) I looked up "pentaerythritol." It is a white solid
costing about $1 US/pound. It is listed in the pocket guide
to chemical hazards with ratings of 5 to 15 mg/cu M for OSHA
and NIOSH. It is an eye, skin, and resp sys irritant. I am
not familiar with this product as a surfactant. It would not
be my choice without testing. It is true that a good
surfactant will reduce the surface tension of flux solution
from 80 dynes/sq cm to 30 dynes/sq cm, which does reduce
LIQUID flux solution in root threads and around
weldments.
2) Coming out of the flux solution very slowly will not
produce less flux on the product. The amount of flux on the
product is adjusted by baume,' and temperature. Always the
product should be in the flux at least 3 to 5 minutes so the
product heats up and then when the product is withdrawn the
flux dries from the heat within the product.
3) Using half a lift and going in half the kettle and then
tractoring to the other end can be done. Remember however
that the total time the product is in the zinc determines
the thickness of the zinc. (e.g. longer in the zinc means
thicker zinc on the steel).
I asked several unrelated questions so as to avoid common
start up problems. Recently I was in a plant that used 3
barrels of sulfuric acid inhibitor per tank and the fumes
were so bad that I could not even work properly. I used one
US gallon per tank of good inhibitor and the fumes were
reduced to ZERO. About 25 years ago I tested about 100
sulfuric acid inhibitors. Only about 5 were good. The others
caused more problems that they solved. Some vaporize out of
the acid, some coat the tanks with black goo, some are
horribly toxic and smelly, some just plain do not work (e.g.
protect the bare steel from further acid attack after
pickling AND greatly reduce fumes in the plant).
If the heating coils are made of the wrong material then
they will fail in a few weeks or months and can destroy the
boiler.
Quadraflux until recently is not a commonly sold flux and I
was curious if it is available in Australia. Is it? It can
easily be made from double or triple salt or even from zinc
chloride and ammonium chloride.
I trust that the 4% aluminum diecasting alloy contains only
aluminum and zinc. Other elements (e.g. copper, Mg, etc.)
would be very harmful. If the entire plant is filled with
white smoke it is possible that you have too much aluminum
in the zinc. It would be useful to know how many kg of
casting alloy was used.
I am still wondering how you will use spray rinses to rinse
the inside of the product and what you will do with this
spray rinse water? (especially when production
increases)
If you get by this way please stop in and catch some
rainbows. They are now 2.5 pounds and will be 4 pounds by
June.
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
March 4, 2008
Bill,
Skimming is uanavoidable. Don't try to dilute your flux, nor
to get less flux on the job, or you'll encounter other
problems. The flux is there for the time of immersion, not
so much as a pretreatment before immersion. Insufficient
flux crystals on the job (dried in place there after the
water carrying it evaporates) and you'll get bare patches,
lumpiness and other quality issues.
The zinc is continually oxidizing on the surface of the
molten kettleful also. Not so much at startup and for a week
or two, but in production use, you'll see the skin forming
all the time. To get good clean bright galvanizing, you must
skim before withdrawl.
It can be difficult if you have not arranged the suspension
wires to facilitate, so think about this when wiring up the
steelwork. Try to get the wires in straight lines across the
bath. They can be as close as 200mm apart between rows of
wires and still aloow skimming.
My design of skimmer is a blade of flatbar steel, about
40x3mm and about 400-500 long. Attached to the middle of
this is a 10-12mm roundbar coming off at rightangles, then
curving back to be about an angle of 30degrees off parallel.
This handle must be long enough to hold from alongside the
kettle where you walk along sort of floating the skimmer
about half submerged and half exposed along the blade
length. Push the skimming from one end of the kettle to the
other. When you encounter a line of wires, give an extra
push and the ash will float past the wires, to be picked up
by the skimmer on the other side. Continue the full
length.
After several dips, you could have a shovel full (or 3) of
ash floating about at one end. Use the skimmer as a chopping
knife to "chop it up" to dislodge any metallics, then use a
perforated spoon (make one for this) to remove the ash. Put
it in a drum or other suitable container (remember its hot).
You can sell this and get perhaps 50% of LME Zinc price for
re-use in a variety of industries.
Judicious arrangement of suspension wires will help
faciliate skimming. With structural steel you'll be using
multiple wires to get the combined tensile strength to
support the steel. (If you need more info on this,
ask)
Depending on kettle width, you might be tempted to make a
single skimmer to span the full length. I don't advise it,
its too hard for the operator. Rather have someone else
attend and help at this stage, one each side, each with a
skimmer. They should be able to skim the full length up to
about a 12m kettle. Longer than that and you might need two
goes, from the centre to each end, as the ash buildup will
be too much to skim easily.
This design of skimmer also makes a good tool for getting
off those drips of Zn that due to low angle, don't drain
naturally. Try to get as much vertical component in the
hanging angle as possible, but there'll always be something
that doesn't drain well, doesn't hang well, and has drips.
Left to solidify, they become spikes, and it takes labout to
remove them. Minimise this work by removing before solid, as
the steel withdraws from the Zn.
You'll also find that on some jobs there's ash forming on
the surface again after a first layer has emerged, and you
can skim between layers of steel as the emerge from the
zinc, giving a nicer finish.
Hope this helps.
|
|
Geoff Crowley
galvanizing &
powder coating shop
Glasgow, Scotland
|
|
March 7, 2008
Bill,
I am always concerned about the short and long term safety and
heath of workers. In your design did you put in an enclosure around
the kettle? If so what type? If not, do you have a shield with a
safety glass window so that during immersion into the zinc the kettle
crane man (and skimmers) can get behind it to avoid zinc spatter? Do
you have audio and flashing lights alarms during immersion in the
zinc? Triple and quadraflux are "sleepers" in that 99% of the time
there is little kettle spatter, whereas a pocket weld or lack of
proper product venting will cause dangerous explosions in the kettle.
In the USA while a galvanizer was dipping a heat exchange coil it
blew up spattering zinc onto a worker, who, until he died was called
the "tin man." Also be aware that the hollow steel tube handle of an
ash skimmer shot a molten ball of zinc into a workers head, he died.
I have never figured out the physics of this "rifle" handle, but it
did happen and perhaps by acid cleaning the skimmer. About one third
of my clients use wooden skimmers, both regular wood and fire
retarded wood. They last a few hours to a few days, and there are
ways to make them last longer.
My article "Accidents and Hazards in Hot Dip Galvanizing is in the
journal Metal Finishing. It was NOT a
well-received article by the industry, but if one worker avoided
serious injury it was worth the bad feed-back.
Most accidents hapen to "visitors." If most or all of your workers
are new to hot dip galvanizing, perhaps you could hire a galvanizer
to speed your learning curve.
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
March 7, 2008
Bill, Here are 25 year old, never published, test results of
bag-house-dust (as percent).
Type Use Zn NH4Cl Pb Fe Al Cr Cd
Wet Job 4.9 19.5 .012 .135 .037 .079 .001
Wet Spin 4.5 1.1 .010 .140 .088 .002 .004
Dry Job 2.5 1.3 .013 .125 .049 .021 0
Dry Job 12.0 12.6 .120 .400 .370 .002 .001
Dry Job 33.8 33.7 1.26 1.25 .479 .004 .006
Dry Job 37.5 28.6 1.03 1.20 .432 .004 .006
Dry Sheet 4.2 21.2 .009 .045 15.2 0 .001
These data need additional duplication before publishing.
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
March 11, 2008
Again gentlemen, thanks for your very helpful comments.
As if anticipating your suggestion, Thomas, we were able to get the
ex-foreman of a galvanizing plant that was shut down a couple of
years ago, to advise on the tricks of manipulating things on the shop
floor. He spent this last Friday and Saturday observing and advising,
and the skimming after immersion that Geoff kindly described in
detail is now described by the plant operator as "a piece of cake". I
wasn't at the plant at the weekend, but believe the work was coming
out quite clean.
He (the ex-foreman) also expressed surprise at the large amount of
white smoke relative to what he used to get using straight triple
salt, so we are adjusting the flux back a bit from quad (actually to
about 3.2-salt) and dropping its density slightly. Over the months to
come, we will play around with that a bit and find the best balance
for that plant and type of work between the flux ratio and density
and the white smoke and the flux consumption and the zinc coating
thickness etc etc...
I'll bring you up to date with operating details later, if the plant
owner permits me to.
|
Bill Reynolds
consultant metallurgist
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
|
March 12, 2008
Bill,
What is 3.2 flux?
Regards, Tom Cook
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
March 13, 2008
Bill,
I figured out what you mean by 3.2 flux. This flux would be 0.2 units
from Triple salt and 0.8 units from quadraflux. This would be a flux
with an "ACN" of 1.258. "ACN" = %ammonium chloride/%zinc chloride.
ACN for double salt is 0.785 (ZnCl2.2NH4Cl). For triple salt ACN is
1.18 (ZnCl2.3NH4Cl). For Quadraflux ACN is 1.57 (ZnCl2.4NH4Cl). It is
not likely that a flux formulator would be knowledgeable in chemical
"moles," which is why I like ACN terminology.
In 1972 I tested a galvanizer's flux who had never used anything but
triple salt (ACN=1.18). The test results showed an ACN of about 0.7.
During galvanizing some rejects had been brought back and only
refluxed, dissolving zinc into the flux solution as zinc chloride.
Thus the ACN goes to a lower value AND the pH goes UP. We added 2,500
pounds of ammonium chloride to the 5,000 US gallon flux tank and the
galvanizing got much, much better (e.g. zinc coating thicknesses were
greatly reduced as were drips, icicles, and many fewer
rejects).
For an article in Metal Finishing, I made up a flux solution in which
I put 1 kg of ammonium chloride and 1 kg of zinc chloride (e.g.
ACN=1.00) and had 12 test companies test for ammonium chloride and
zinc chloride (Fig. 4 in the article). NONE of these "certified"
companies got a usable result for ACN, even though they charged
between $50--$300/sample. I also had them test sulfate and iron and
about 20% of these companies got usable results.
Your new guy (who worked for a previous galvanizer) was probably
accustomed to a flux which he thought was triple salt but in reality
had an ACN near or below double salt. The South African's had an ACN
of about 0.5 and a baume' of about 40. I took out 3/4 of the old flux
solution and added 4 tons of ammonium chloride and water and a good
surfactant. I also heated the tank to 71C. The reduction of zinc used
was $8,000/day (when zinc was cheap). They took me to Kruger Park on
a long weekend for a look see. Your new guy will bring with him all
of his good knowledge AND some knowledge that is NOT so good. For
example, it is never a good idea to put zinc floor sweepings or dross
or ash into the flux tank (to neutralize carried over acid). The
technology is simple but you must know and understand what
works.
In-plant ACN testing, in-plant iron, and in-plant sulfate testing are
readily available. You need these for testing your flux and (sulfate
testing) for your spray rinse water. I expect that your flux tank
will become contaminated with sulfate within a year due to your spray
rinse system.
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
March 14, 2008
Bill,
There are so many, many important items in constructing and operating
a galvanizing plant, I am concerned, that things are likely to get
screwed up fairly soon. The owners of the plant expect to make a
profit above their investment and operating costs. The "floor"
galvanizer that you just hired comes from a plant that was shut down
a few years ago. Why?
Your owners have invested a few million dollars to build the plant
(according to some of your recommendations), it is time to invest a
few thousand dollars on the best galvanizing consultants you can find
to make sure that it operates as you have designed.
Regards,
Dr. Thomas H.
Cook
Dr.
Thomas H. Cook, Galvanizing Consultant
Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
January 4, 2009
can you brief me of inplant testing method of Sulfates in Flux
& rinsing water . What are the chemicals required, what are the
apparatus & what is the method.
Rajesh Mishra
- Vadodara, Gujrat, India
-
-
 |