| |
Letter 36051
Cadmium blistering/adhesion problems
[Oregon]
+++++
We have two cyanide cadmium plating tanks. Recently a 15% draw off
of the solution was conducted to maintain the carbonate levels. After
this draw, one, and only one, of the tanks started having
blistering/adhesion problems. The draw and chemistry make up was
conducted in the same fashion.
Specifics:
Similarities
Both tanks use the same cleaner and HCl pickle.
These problems are limited to areas of the parts where the surface
finish callout is 16 or smoother.
The chemistry of both tanks is very close, and are well towards the
mid range of the specification.
Current densities of plated parts are set the same between
tanks.
Size and agitation in both tanks are similar.
Temperatures are within 2 degrees.
Differences:
The tank without problems has measured rectifier ripple of 45%
compared with 5% on the problem tank.
The tank without problems has ~60% of the anodic surface area
compared with the troublesome tank.
Part to anode distance is 9" and 11" for the bad and good tank,
respectively.
The bad tank has an FRP liner and the good tank has a Koroseal
liner.
This has become a real puzzler, and any help or insight relating to
troubleshooting the tank would be appreciated.
David Harvey
Aerospace - Portland, OR, USA
+++++
I think this calls for Hull Cell testing. I think you can use a
hanging Hull Cell in this case, which would further reduce the
variables.

Ted Mooney, P.E.
finishing.com Inc. - Brick,
NJ
+++++
Has chromic acid from chromate carryover thru ragged racks entered
the tank?
Have you mixed in titanium anode baskets, which alternately anodize
and do not pass current causing voltage increase and then strip whjen
the current is turned off?
Surface Prep? Are you plating onto leaded steel or 4000 high strength
steel?
Switch the rectifier leads to opposite tanks and see what
happens.
Dip out solution into a 5 gallon bucket, hang over an anode basket,
add 4 oz/gal Sodium Cyanide, plate and see what happens.
+++++
Thank you for all the input. Follow up to the suggestions
are:
Hull cell plating between the tanks was inconclusive regarding
adhesion.
Chrome levels in the tanks were measured and were quite low (<
2ppm).
We do use titanium baskets to hold our cadmium anode balls, but this
has not changed in years.
We are plating 4000 series steels and use a strong alkaline soap
clean followed by HCl pickle prior to plating.
Our tanks are not close enough together to allow for switching of the
bussing to test differences in the ripple.
We did notice an improvement by putting reverse current to the anode
baskets, but I'm not sure if this is coincidental or not. Any insight
as to why this might improve the condition?
Also, I have always considered plating adhesion to happen on such a
micro level that surface roughness should not have a real effect. Is
this the case?
Thanks again for all the feedback.
David Harvey
- Portland, OR, USA
+++++
You cannot use titanium baskets in a cyanide solution. When the
current is turned on the titanium "anodizes" and becomes less
conductive, the voltage goes up (if automatic) and the current goes
down. Recommend change to steel baskets now.
A dip in HCl on 4000 is seldom enough activation, try a Nickel
Chloride Strike: 2 Pounds per gallon Nickel Chloride with one quart
per gallon HCl, cathodic. Do not use the S-rounds - use Rolled
Depolarized Anodes and take then out when not in use.
Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do--
- I want to answer or follow-up on this subject
publicly (in non-commercial
fashion).
-
- My company is a supporting advertiser at
finishing.com and we want the contact information to reach
the inquirer privately.
-
- I want to post a new
question or inquiry of my own on
a different subject.
-
 |
|