|
|
![]() (Cycles thru suppliers) |
![]() |
Letter 35049 JS500 vs Dacromet [England]+++++ Due to problems with Hydrogen Embrittlement in Zinc Electro-Plated
bolts We have been recently investigating into JS500 and Dacromet
surface finishes. through testing we have discovered that JS500
treated fasteners degradate quickly in a salt spray environment
compared to zinc electroplated ones but retain the same hardness and
yield strength of a untreated bolt. We have also tested a sample of
fasteners coated with a Dacromet 500 finish, these bolts where softer
and had a lower yield point (lower torque required to be applied to
the fastener before it yields) though we have been assured that the
Dacromet bolt will last 400+ hours in a salt spray test. Hugh Doble Ed. note: Although this question is cast as a comparison of two proprietary products, it is largely a question of competing technologies and we would appreciate any responses being phrased as generically as possible and with as little product advocacy as possible.
+++++ Dacromet (trademarked by Metal Coatings International) and JS500 (trademarked by MacDermid, Inc.) are entirely different technologies. Since you are concerned about hydrogen embrittlement, I think I can safely assume that the JS500 is applied over mechanical zinc and not electro zinc. It is a good process, and salt spray (if the process is performed correctly) is dramatically better than zinc and yellow chromate. Dacromet, too, is a good process. It is a dip-spin paint formulated from (primarily) zinc flakes, aluminum flakes, chromic acid and organic monomers. Salt spray should be comparable. The generic term for JS500 is usually leachant-sealant, and a number of vendors supply this technology. I don't think there are commercially successful offsets to Dacromet; the formulations by Doerken and Magni are similar but hex-chrome free. It is possible to formulate a leachant-sealant with an integral wax to improve the lubricity; often dip-spin paints are lubricated after painting and curing. I hope that this helps. (I've avoided trade names except when absolutely necessary.) Tom Rochester
+++++ I don't have any info on these two processes, but I would be
interested in learning of the particular application. Martin Rich
+++++ The Bolts actual Material is a Medium Carbon Alloy steel hardened to property class 12.9 to ISO898-1, due to confidentiality I can't reveal it's exact application but can say that it the brake disc bolt on a vehicles running gear. Since the last posting Dacromet has been Enviromentally tested and confirms that if done correctly it offers Enviromental protection to a defence standard. Any further information or comments about the two different coatings would be much appreciated. Hugh Doble
+++++ My understanding of that issue is that the manufacturer of Dacromet, Metal Coatings International, has a chrome-free finish which they call Geomet rather than Dacromet. But 'Dacromet' is whatever the trademark holder says it is, and possibly they have put the Dacromet name on the chrome-free product now. The manufacturer is the best source for info on that.
+++++ It's very hard to compare those two products.
Dacromet can go up to more
than 1000 hours, not JS500. To me JS500 is just a way to improve a
zinc plating, but in Europe, now the trend is rather with
zinc-nickel+sealer platings for good resistance. But if you are
looking for high salt spray and chemicals resistance, better go for
Dacromet. Olivier Bost
Dear Reader: please choose what you want to do--
![]() |
|
Save
This Page (why?) - Home - ©1995-2008 finishing.com