|
Letter 3073
Hard Anodizing 7050 Alloy
-
We are curently having difficulty hard anodizing 7050 alloy in the
T73511 temper. The specific confiiguration of the part is a 1/4"
plate with two (2) 1" slots milled in the plate. The exterior of the
plate coats without any difficulty, but the inside of the slots have
a white looking deposit. A microsection of the slot reveals 0.0003"
coating.
The bath contains 12.5 oz/gal sulfuric Acid, 2.5 oz/gal oxalic
acid and is chilled to 32ƒF. We ramp the current slowly to prevent
burning and when we reach 30 volts, we hold at 30 volts for 1.5 hours
to obtain our coating thickness. We are not experiencing any problems
with any other alloys (6061, 7075, A356), only 7050.
Ken Minks
aircraft company - Wichita, KS
June 22 -
Hi Ken, there are a few questions that might help. Do you know the
current density for the parts in question as run? Does the powdery
coating continue to rub off in the slots, ie; an amorphous coating,
or is it a surface condition? Has the racking been evaluated for
current carrying capacity? Are you racking in the slots? What
agitation conditions do you have around the parts where they are
located in the tank? Have you run other 7050 parts, if so what are
the surface conditions there? Is there a "bullseye" appearance around
the slots? My first guess would be that localized overheating is
taking place and causing a fast dissolution rate at those surfaces
causing an amorphous coating. Especially since you are only seeing a
.0003 inch thickness after an hour and a half of anodizing. If that
is the case evaluating the racking electrical current carrying
capacity and a slower ramp, with increased agitation may help. 7050
should anodize satisfactorily.
Ward Barcafer, CEF aerospace - Wichita, Kansas
-
A problem like this is hard to pinpoint without seeing the part.
Ward's comments should be highly beneficial. I also wondered about
the possibility of mechanical finshing residues in the slots that are
not being removed in the cleaning process. This is assuming that the
face of the plate is sanded, polished, or has some other mechanical
finish. Another possibility is that air bubbles from air agitation
could be hanging up in the slots.
I don't know if this has anything to do with your problem, but I
noted that you are ramping to a given voltage and holding it there.
If hardcoat anodizers out there were willing to discuss their
processing secrets, I would bet that the vast majority would tell you
would get a much better hardcoat if you anodized at constant current
density. Hardcoat differs from conventional anodizing in that it has
a very tight pore structure and much higher coating density. The high
coating density is produced by anodizing at much higher current
densities than conventional anodizing. Higher current densities means
a lot more heat being generated, which is why you need to maintain
cold temperatures. Understand that as the coating thickness builds
up, the surface resistance climbs, and the voltage will climb if
current is held constant. If voltage is held constant, current
density drops off, and the rate of coating build up slows down, which
is why you need an hour and a half in the tank to get your desired
thickness. I consider 90 minutes in the tank as excessive, and it
just may be leading to dissolution in the slots. I doubt if the hard
coat is very hard, and may even be powdery as Ward suggests..
You didn't say what coating thickness you expect on the parts, but
if you anodize at 30-36 asf, you should be able to achieve 2 mils in
40-50 minutes. As Ward says, rack design for hardcoat is very
important, and it will be more critical if you do anodize by current
control. If you are anodizing to 2 mils, your rectifier necessarily
should have at least 75 volts capacity, and preferrably 100 volts,
with ramping capabilities, of course, and ability to control by
current as well as by voltage. Of the alloys you mention, the rise in
voltage will be highest in 6061, because its hardcoat will be
superior (i.e. harder, denser) to that on the other alloys.

|
Phil Johnson
Madison Heights, Michigan
|
-
-
 |