HOME FAQs BOOKS JOBS: Help Wanted Suggestions you are here: Hotline/Forum => Letter 27045

Why use AMS QQ P 35 for aerospace instead of ASTM A 967?

++++

Due to the canceling of QQ P 35 two alternatives were given, does anyone know the reason for using AMS QQ-P-35 [link is to spec at TechStreet] for aerospace instead of ASTM A967 [link is to spec at TechStreet]-99? I guess what I'm asking is what is the difference between the two specs?

James Geary
Quality manager - Dublin, Santry, Ireland

ANSWER or FOLLOW UP POST an unrelated QUESTION HOT Topics

Disclaimer: It is not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information
presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The
internet is largely anonymous; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: