|
Letter 2083
Problems encountered whilst de-embrittling
zinc plating
--
We experience problems de-embrittling zinc plated high tensile
steel parts. This is not a new problem, we have continuously had
problems for 50+ yrs., and other British platers apparently do as
well. We used to do cadmium plating, and never had any problems with
this process. However, items that were previously cadmium plated and
are now zinc plated present problems. This indicates that the zinc
plating is the source of the problems.
The problem:
Bad blistering, or dulling of the plating after de-embrittlement.
This does not occur on every item in a batch and it is difficult to
identify why this should be. The problem does not occur on every base
material, but those that give rise to problems are always
troublesome. We cannot see any pattern in the base materials, except
one job that is heat treated (to harden it) just before we receive it
for plating is always bad. However, when we ask our customers if
other problem jobs are heat-treated this does not always seem to be
the case.
Has anyone experienced these problems? And solved them. Please let
me have your thoughts.

David Grimes
plating company - Farnham, Surrey, UK
--
Dear Dave ,
I have experienced this same problem years ago when Chloride Zincs
were first on the market , it seemed at the time that the
"Blistering" was not a blister as such more an Exifoliation , the
Zinc used to "grow" and just flake off ,but never to the base steel
always to a Zinc base , I thought that the problem was caused by high
concentrations of the Wetter component of the Brightener system , any
way we seemed to be able to overcome the problem by lessening the
wetter component from about 3% by volume to about 2.2 --> 2.5 %
maximum with a corresponding drop in the brightener component , from
memory the add rate of the brightener was down to 70 % of that
recommended by the supplier .
I know there have been improvements in the systems in the meantime
but it is worth a try anyway , if it fixes your problem let us know
regards

John Tenison - Woods
- Victoria Australia
--
DAVID,
THE HARDNESS OF THE BASE METAL PLAYS AN INTEGRAL PART IN WHETHER
THE ZINC PLATE STAYS ON OR BLISTERS. ANY STEEL PART WITH A HARDNESS
OF 38 ROCKWELL C OR GREATER, SHOULD NOT BE ZINC ELECTROPLATED.
HYDROGEN EMBRITTLEMENT IS THE CULPRIT. MECHANICAL PLATING WHICH DOES
NOT IMPART HYDROGEN INTO THE BASE METAL IS REALLY THE CHOICE OF
PLATING.
IN N.A. FORD, GENERAL MOTORS, AND CHRYSLER ALL HAVE MECHANICAL
PLATING SPECIFICATIONS JUST FOR THIS PURPOSE. CHECK WITH TERRY CLARKE
OF MACDERMID G.B. FOR MORE
INFORMATION
I KNOW OF SOME PLATERS, BECAUSE I USED TO BE ON THE CHEMICAL
SUPPLY SIDE, DO GET AWAY WITH THIS BLISTERING BY REWORKING THE PARTS.
GUARANTEED - THEY WILL BE FINE THE SECOND TIME THROUGH. MAKE SURE YOU
ADJUST YOUR PRICE ACCORDINGLY.
FINALLY, THE TYPE OF SOLUTION ie. CYANIDE/CHLORIDE/ALKALINE AND
THE THICKNESS OF THE DEPOSIT WILL CAUSE BLISTERING
- CHLORIDES HAVE A HIGH ORGANIC INCLUSION IN THE DEPOSIT WHICH
WILL EXPAND UPON HEATING EG.BLISTERS
- ALKALINES ARE PRONE TO "POST DELAYED BLISTERING" DUE TO STRESS
- CYANIDES ALTHOUGH THEY DO NOT COMMONLY BLISTER CAN IF
OVERLOADED WITH ORGANICS
- ANY ELECTROPLATED ZINC DEPOSIT, AS IT APPROACHES 1.0 MILS IN
THICKNESS, WILL TEND TO BLISTER.
REGARDS
RAY
ray delorey
- CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO, CANADA
--
I have experienced similar problems with Zinc plating blistering
prior to painting when the paint was forced cured, or powder coated.
I also believe it is a problem with entrained brighteners,or
brightener levels. However, interestingly enough, the main prevention
step was determined to be controlling the plate thickness. When the
thickness was controlled to .2-.3 mils the problem went away.When the
plate thickness was above .4 mils it blistered when heated.
Ward Barcafer, CEF aerospace - Wichita, Kansas
.
While probably stating the obvious, the embrittlement of
high-strength (i.e. high-carbon) steels is due to entrapment of
atomic hydrogen in the steel.
My experience with this problem was when having high-strength
carbon steel parts plated with zinc chromate in a batch plating
process. The only solution we found was baking of the plated parts at
350-375 deg F for 1-3 hours (depends on thickness of part). This
theoretically removed quantities of entrapped hydrogen from the steel
and coating. This completely eliminated the problem without changing
the plating process itself. These parts were AISI 4140/4150 steels
which were heat-treated prior to plating with tensile strength in the
150 ksi range. The baking requirements for your steels might be
somewhat different. If we did not bake these products we encountered
periodic embrittlement failures in service. The metallurgical
condition of the steel to be treated also influences the
embrittlement potential.
It is probable that hardened parts require consideration of a
different cleaning method to reduce the potential for hydrogen
embrittlement. Blast-cleaning or alkaline cleaning pretreatment may
reduce the potential for hydrogen embrittlement for high-carbon,
high-strength steels when compared to other methods which evolve
hydrogen as a by-product. Those more knowledgeable about plating
process might know other plating process controls which could achieve
reduction in hydrogen entrapment.
Robert P. McCrossen
- Jacksonville, Florida, USA
-
-
 |