|
Letter 16063
Zinc Plated Fasteners vs. Stainless Steel
++
My company is developing an outdoor product line which is
primarily made up of 6063-T5 aluminum extrusions. We decided to
switch to all 18-8 stainless steel fasteners for corrosion
resistance, but there has been some second guessing as to why we
didn't decide to use zinc plated steel fasteners. One reason for the
questions is because of the higher cost of the stainless fasteners.
In our application, a hex bolt is slid into a channel in the aluminum
extrusion, and a the assembly is fastened together with stainless
steel brackets. The concern that we have is with the potential for
galvanic corrosion due to the fact that we have dissimilar materials
in direct contact with each other.
My question is, would zinc plated fasteners be a suitable
alternate to the stainless steel fasteners? How would the appearance
of the bolts (rust) compare to that of stainless over a period of
years in an outdoor environment? How much galvanic corrosion would we
see with the zinc plated fasteners as opposed to with the stainless
steel?
Thanks for any help you can provide?
Scott Liebert
- Milwaukee, WI
++
You probably know that, were it not for its toxicity, the ideal
fastener material is cadmium plated steel. It is so close to aluminum
on the galvanic scale that there is no galvanic corrosion, it is
corrosion resistant itself, and it has great lubricity. Nonetheless,
cadmium is a cumulative poison, should be reserved for only the most
critical applications, and even there is being rapidly phased out.
The next best material is aluminum plating or coating, again
because the galvanic potential is zero. You can investigate Ivadizing
for vapor deposition of aluminum, or AlumiPlate for electroplating of
aluminum. I fear that you may find the cost unacceptable though.
I am a bit confused by your reference to stainless steel brackets
because these will (theoretically) cause the aluminum to galvanically
corrode regardless of the fastener material. And, presumably being
larger in surface area than the hardware, they will have a more
powerful impact.
All of the above not withstanding, you didn't mention how the
aluminum is corrosion proofed, so the question is a bit open. But I
have seen stainless fasteners used on architectually anodized
aluminum in outdoor exposure without any substantial problems. The
zinc plating is not a good idea in my opinion because it will be
short lived.
|
|

Ted Mooney, P.E.
finishing.com
Brick, New Jersey
|
July 30, 2009
my company is producing small gasoline engine, we sell our product
to Southeast Asian for the long tail boat, but recently we met a
serious corrosion on outside fasteners produced by zinc plating, the
material of fasteners is low carbon steel, it is been use for fixing
some steel stamping parts and plastic panels I am not sure if there
are some galvanic corrosion between fasteners and other dissimilar
parts, considering from cost, do we have any other proper choice or
solution.
Nick Lu
- ChongQing China
July 31, 2009
Hi, Nick. There are many choices for fastener coatings including
galvanizing, organic coating, mechanical plating, electroless nickel
plating, zinc alloy platings, aluminum Ivadizing, and so on.
But I'm afraid that I don't understand your question, and don't
understand the application in a "long tail boat". You need to
determine whether there were or weren't galvanic compatability issues
(and you haven't told us what other metals are involved), and you
have to determine whether the plating was defective in this
particular case, or whether zinc plating is a bad specification. Zinc
plating is rarely sufficient for exposed outdoor use, and ceetainly
not in a marine environment.
No other corrosion resistant coating will be as inexpensive as
zinc plating though.
Regards,
 |

Ted Mooney
finishing.com
Brick, New Jersey |
-
-
 |